Cammack and Dingell unveil bipartisan bill to advance women’s healthcare coverage and care for breast cancer survivors
Press release from U.S. Rep. Kat Cammack
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, U.S. Representatives Kat Cammack (R-FL-03) and Debbie Dingell (D-MI-06) introduced the Advancing Women’s Health Coverage Act, bold bipartisan legislation to modernize the Women’s Health and Cancer Rights Act of 1998 (WHCRA) and ensure every breast cancer survivor has access to comprehensive, up-to-date reconstructive care.
“Women should be fighting cancer rather than insurance companies. Every woman battling breast cancer deserves access to the best care modern medicine can offer — not limits based on outdated insurance codes & bureaucratic red tape,” said Rep. Cammack. “For too long, survivors have been denied coverage for proven reconstructive options that restore confidence, dignity, and quality of life. This bill puts patients back in charge, ensuring their recovery, health, and confidence aren’t dictated by a system stuck in the 1990s.”
“Every person diagnosed with breast cancer deserves access to the full range of options that support their recovery. Reconstructive surgery is not just about appearance — it’s a part of the healing process that helps patients recover both physically and emotionally,” said Rep. Dingell. “By closing insurance loopholes, this bill not only expands access to comprehensive reconstructive care but also provides breast cancer survivors the dignity of choice in their treatment journey.”
“These changes ensure no breast cancer patient is left behind when it comes to accessing the best possible reconstructive care,” said C. Bob Basu, MD, MBA, MPH, President of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. “This legislation empowers patients with the reconstruction and recovery resources they deserve.”
“The updates are not just about procedures, but about patient autonomy and choice,” said Babak Mehrara, MD, President of The Plastic Surgery Foundation. “Modernization ensures breast cancer patients are fully supported with care from diagnosis through recovery.”
“Access to reconstructive surgery after mastectomy is an essential part of mastectomy care for those patients who make the deeply personal decision to choose reconstruction. For over 25 years, the Women’s Health and Cancer Rights Act has ensured patients have coverage for reconstructive surgery, but it is past time that our laws reflect the rights of patients to full, modern mastectomy and post-mastectomy care,” says Molly Guthrie, Vice President of Policy and Advocacy at Susan G. Komen. “Modernizing this law to guarantee affordable access to needed services after mastectomy – whether that be chest wall reconstruction, breast reconstruction, or the use of breast prostheses – is an important opportunity for all stakeholders to come together and support the breast cancer community. Susan G. Komen applauds Representatives Cammack, Dingell, Van Duyne, McBath, Hinson, McClain Delaney, Kim, and Pettersen for their leadership in bringing coverage into the 21st century by introducing the Advancing Women’s Health Coverage Act.”
Additional original co-sponsors of the bill include Representatives April McClain Delaney (D-MD-06), Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D-WA-03), Ashley Hinson (R-IA-02), Young Kim (R-CA-07), Laurel Lee (R-FL-15), Lucy McBath (D-GA-06), Brittany Petterson (D-CO-07), and Beth Van Duyne (R-TX-24).
The Advancing Women’s Health Coverage Act:
- Expands coverage to include all recognized breast reconstruction options — from implant-based procedures to advanced microsurgical and combination techniques.
- Protects patients by guaranteeing coverage for all reconstruction procedures listed under the Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS Level I).
- Empowers survivors with insurance coverage for flat closure, symmetrical reconstruction, and custom prostheses.
- Improves access by requiring at least one in-network provider for every recognized reconstruction modality.
- Protects medical judgment, prohibiting insurance denials that override physicians’ expertise while preserving flexibility in rate negotiations.
- Drives accountability through a GAO study assessing ongoing gaps and disparities in reconstructive care.
Closing Gaps, Advancing Care
More than 300,000 women in the U.S. are diagnosed with breast cancer each year. While medical innovation has transformed reconstructive surgery, outdated insurance codes have not kept pace — leaving many survivors without access to the procedures their doctors recommend.
Originally enacted over 25 years ago, the Women’s Health and Cancer Rights Act was a pioneering step toward fairness in coverage. The Advancing Women’s Health Coverage Act builds on that legacy, ensuring that federal law reflects today’s medical standards and every survivor’s right to full recovery.
Supported by multiple cancer advocacy and medical associations, the bill will be referred to the Education and Workforce Committee, Energy and Commerce Committee, and Ways and Means Committee.


That rush you hear is insurance rates going up. What are yiu doing to fix social security?
Yeah. let ’em croak. We need more submarines and tax cuts for billionaires and with less old ladies, win-win.
Social Security?
https://www.crfb.org/socialsecurityreformer/?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=21061404427&gbraid=0AAAAADs3w0LzzKOeWFRgNIm6AiWAdb9LX&gclid=CjwKCAjw6vHHBhBwEiwAq4zvA_nI8BwX83O7A0zYRspsLXmSYVSuiIrZVW3CQgebVEoDXMVbh0xRIRoC3NYQAvD_BwE
Definitely need more submarines.
Less ladies on them though.
That’s a good point. Never know if a bar fist fight will break out during shore leave or if the sub is boarded by pirates.
Obviously you have zero understanding on life onboard a submarine.
However, you at least have common sense as to the physical capabilities of a man vs a woman and which you would rather have on your side should a fight ensue. You’ve inadvertently given credibility to some of the current Sec of Defense policies. Maybe you’ll get a medal.
Sure This May Work, as no doubt the biggest threat we face in the future is a fist fight with China. We all know how women struggle with remotes, so they can’t “man” drone attacks, or even drive very well and I guess that’s how Senator Tammy Duckworth lost her leg piloting a helicoptor hit by a rocket in Iraq. Yeah, given the legendary behavioral restraint shown by young men and older male teenagers vs the lack of seriousness and intelligence shown by young women, we should avoid any contributions to our defense by the latter.
Instead of more surgeries and higher insurance rates, how about more efforts at prevention and working to reduce the costs of health care?
Pander, our geniuses in DC have cut medical research funding significantly – including here at UF – to help fund their rich guy tax cut.
How exactly does one prevent breast cancer?
Hey! Great question for medical researhers. I’ll bet none of them have thought to look into that.
While they’re researching, think they can solve your stupidity and your fealty to far left progressive ideologies?
That’s probably beyond our current technologies and research capabilities.
m0r0n LOL
Glad to see Kat do something worthwhile.
She’s pandering to her lobbyists…the medical & insurance industries this time. Uniparty Kat strikes again. She is the definition of an industry plant. There is nothing conservative about her…she’s as Big Government as they come.
Here’s the particular lobby for this bill:
American Society of Plastic Surgeons
(I’ve tried to include a link to their website regarding this bill but this comment platform is instantly deleting it…not even pending for approval)
https://tinyurl.com/ASPS-Bill
Here you go…I created a tiny url for the webpage
Indeed Slice. All this money we’ve spent on drugs and research for decades and our life expectancy has only declined.
Wait!
I’ve had 2 types of cancer in my life, one pretty common and mostly not dangerous, but another that can be but was found early and responded to radiation. With heart problems I’ve had, I’d have been dead several times over by now if not for modern medicine. That doesn’t mean private companies like pharaceutical companies won’t primarily exist to make money, but they – and publicly funded researchers – generally have to deveop products of value to make that money.
To recap, the highest legislative priority of the House Rep for Florida’s 3rd District involves big government interference to mandate private insurance companies to pay for breast implants. And she probably wonders why she’s so unpopular.
Wasn’t there a Gainesville employee arrested several years ago for using a city credit card to pay for a butt lift or something?
She unpopular because she’s a right-wing hypocrite — always This for Me, but NOT for Thee.