fbpx

Foreign national convicted of conspiring to export drill rigs made in Alachua to Iran in violation of U.S. sanctions laws

Staff report from press release from U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Florida

GAINESVILLE, Fla. – A federal jury convicted Brian Assi, also known as Brahim Assi, on October 24 of conspiring to violate the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations (ITSR), attempted unlawful export of goods from the United States to Iran without a license, attempted smuggling goods from the United States, submitting false or misleading export information, and conspiracy to commit money laundering.

“The defendant schemed to unlawfully export U.S.-origin mining drills to Iran, while deceiving his employer into believing that they were being sent to Iraq,” said Assistant Attorney General Matthew G. Olsen of the Justice Department’s National Security Division. “This conviction affirms the Justice Department’s resolve to disrupt and hold accountable those who evade our sanctions against Iran, wherever in the world they may be.”

According to Libby Lastinger from the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Assi worked for Sandvik in its Middle East office and the rigs were manufactured and shipped from the company’s factory in the city of Alachua.

“As this verdict makes clear, no matter how hard you try to obfuscate your scheme to send restricted U.S. items to Iran, we will work tirelessly to bring your conduct to light and ensure you face justice,” said Assistant Secretary for Export Enforcement Matthew S. Axelrod of the Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS). “We take action whenever we uncover attempts to evade our sanctions, especially when those efforts are designed to support adversaries like Iran.”

“Efforts to conceal impermissible transactions and circumvent imposed sanctions represent a threat to both the United States economic and national security interests,” said U.S. Attorney Jason R. Coody for the Northern District of Florida. “Today’s verdict demonstrates our collective resolve to hold those who violate regulatory restrictions accountable for their criminal conduct.”

According to evidence presented at trial, Assi was a Middle East-based salesman for Sandvik, a multinational heavy machinery manufacturer with a U.S.-based subsidiary and production plant located in Alachua. Assi conspired with individuals affiliated with Sakht Abzar Pars Co. (SAP-Iran), based in Tehran, Iran, to export U.S.-made heavy machinery indirectly to Iran without first obtaining the required licenses from the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC).

Assi and his Iranian co-conspirators orchestrated the scheme by locating an Iraq-based distributor to serve as the forward-facing purchaser of two U.S.-origin blasthole drills from Sandvik. The drills are a type of heavy machinery used to create holes in the ground that are then filled with controlled explosives for mining.

Assi facilitated the sale of the drills and attempted to export them to Iran and used freight forwarding companies to ship the heavy equipment from the U.S. to Turkey. In doing so, Assi concealed any Iranian involvement in the transaction from his employer, claiming the drills were ultimately destined for use in Iraq. But in truth, Assi intended for his Iranian co-conspirators to transship or reexport those items from Turkey to Iran, in circumvention of U.S. export control and sanctions laws.

In furtherance of the conspiracy, Assi concealed his activities with his Iranian co-conspirators by causing false information to be entered into the Automated Export System (AES), a U.S.-government database containing information about exports from the United States. The U.S.-based plant hired a U.S. freight forwarder to arrange the drill’s export from the United States to Iraq. As part of the shipping process, the freight forwarder submitted information to AES about the shipment, including the ultimate consignee’s name and the ultimate delivery destination. Assi misled his employer by claiming that the Iraqi distributor was the ultimate consignee and that the ultimate delivery destination was Iraq. In fact, Assi knew that his co-conspirators in Iran were the true intended recipients and Iran was the ultimate intended delivery destination.

In furtherance of the illicit transaction, Assi and his co-conspirators caused the transfer of approximately $2.7 million from Turkey to pass through the United States.

Sentencing for Brian Assi is scheduled for Jan. 7, 2025.

The BIS is investigating the case.

Assistant U.S. Attorneys Andrew J. Grogan and Harley W. Ferguson for the Northern District of Florida and Trial Attorney Ahmed Almudallal of the National Security Division’s Counterintelligence and Export Control Section are prosecuting the case.

  • Politically convenient prosecution. The financial and legal systems are weaponized. Americans can sell bombs to Ukraine and Israel but can’t sell a drill rig to Iran via Iraq? All under the guise of national security which is a euphemism for corporate interest.

    • The multinational corps that were hit by the US imposed Russian sanctions just closed down any exports from US (and allies) factories and started importing from factories in “non western countries”. See Coca-Cola and PepsiCo as two of the thousands of examples. Sanctions have zero to do with harming the sanctioned and all bankers know this. As you alluded to, it is solely a corporate scheme disguised as a political beating stick and really only harms the exporters (western nations in this instance).

  • “As this verdict makes clear, no matter how hard you try to obfuscate your scheme to send restricted U.S. items to Iran, we will work tirelessly to bring your conduct to light and ensure you face justice,” ???
    But…..
    We will continue to barter with Iran for their oil and energy exports too the US. 😆

  • Hey, don’t let the facts of this successful prosecution and the valid reasons for it get in the way of your conspiracy theories.

    Sanctions are not fool proof, but they do provide peaceful penalties on the economies of targeted nations. Russia’s economy is estimated to have lost 5% of it’s GDP because of them and has had to cut governmental services in country. The effects on Iran’s economy have been much more severe, though critics note that those suffering the most in both countries are citizens, not oligarchs.

  • >