Gainesville City Commission discusses changes to ordinances on public camping and pedestrians in the median

The Gainesville City Commission met as the General Policy Committee on September 25

BY JENNIFER CABRERA

GAINESVILLE, Fla. – At the September 25 General Policy Committee meeting, the Gainesville City Commission discussed changes to their ordinances that prohibit public camping and restrict pedestrians from sitting or standing in certain medians.

After approving a contract to pay Andrew Persons $245,000 to serve as Interim City Manager, the Commission discussed changes to their public right-of-way ordinances. 

Public camping: law enforcement agencies are having issues with the word “overnight”

Special Projects Administrator Phil Mann said the City’s public camping ordinance is working well, for the most part, but law enforcement agencies are having issues with the word “overnight” in the ordinance because “overnight” is not defined: “So when they encounter somebody camping in either the public right-of-way, a public park, or on public property, when, exactly, is overnight? And so it has, at times, created a resource issue for GPD in which they’ve had to go back out a second time” to make sure the person has been there “overnight.”

Mann said the request was to strike the word “overnight” in two places: one is “residing overnight in temporary outdoor habitation,” and the other is “residing overnight in an outdoor space without a tent or other temporary shelter.” He said that would allow the police department to address the issue immediately when a complaint is received. Mann added, “Elsewhere in the ordinance, it does say it is unlawful for any person or entity to engage in public camping or sleeping on any public property or right-of-way.”

Staff’s recommendation was to refer this to the City Attorney to review the ordinance and bring back appropriate modifications.

Willits: “God forbid I ever fall asleep in the beautiful sun rays of a November day or March day, out on the plaza.”

Commissioner Casey Willits said, “God forbid I ever fall asleep in the beautiful sun rays of a November day or March day, out on the plaza.” He asked why they couldn’t define “overnight” instead of deleting it. He suggested a definition related to the times the various parks close. 

Ingle: “I feel like people exist, and we can’t legislate them out of existing.”

Commissioner James Ingle said, “I don’t want us to get to the point where, if one of our homeless neighbors is asleep in a park during the day, not bothering anyone or anything else, they can be harassed or arrested… I feel like people exist, and we can’t legislate them out of existing.”

Commissioner Cynthia Chestnut recommended looking at the language implemented by other municipalities. 

City Attorney Daniel Nee said the state statute allows individuals to notify the City if people are camping or sleeping overnight in a public right-of-way, and the City has to remove them within a certain amount of time or the complainant can bring a private cause of action for damages against the City. He said that when the City ordinance was written, his office decided to use the language from the statute.

Book: “I don’t think our public safety would ever be interacting with people [who take a nap for 10 minutes].”

Commissioner Ed Book read parts of the ordinance that were more specific about sleeping in public areas: “‘lodging or residing overnight in a temporary outdoor habitation used as a dwelling or living space and evidenced by the erection of a tent or other temporary shelter, the presence of bedding or pillows’… I don’t think our public safety would ever be interacting with people [who take a nap for 10 minutes]. There’s clear other indicators, and I think that we police in a way that’s very compassionate and professional.”

GPD gets “copious daytime calls” about people sleeping in public spaces

Gainesville Police Department Chief Nelson Moya said the ordinance “doesn’t necessarily speak of someone taking a nap, which we are very cognizant of, because… napping is not unlawful… What becomes an issue for us is when we are in the presence of a person in a public space with all the other things that are highlighted here — their tent,… personal belongings, sleeping material, where you’re now, in essence, lounging or camping.” He said officers routinely field these calls, and the department is looking for clear direction from the City Commission about “what to do in those moments.” He said they get “copious daytime calls, [and] we’re literally stuck. And then we have property owners that are saying, you know, get folks to move along… We fall back to, ‘Look, it speaks of overnight,’ and that’s where it gets tricky for us.” Moya said GPD is currently using 10 p.m. to 8 a.m. as “overnight.”

Willits: Removing the word “overnight” would “open it up 24/7, so that the public can have even more reason to get GPD to enforce and clear homeless people away”

Willits said that if they removed the word “overnight,” it would “open it up 24/7, so that the public can have even more reason to get GPD to enforce and clear homeless people away. So I want to make sure our argument is sound here, and it sounds like we are arguing around, rather than — we’re finding any last reason to get rid of homeless people. I’m sorry, I’m feeling emotional about this.”

Commissioner Bryan Eastman suggested leaving the ordinance as it is and looking at other cities, as Chestnut had suggested. 

Persons: Most complaints are for people “who are actually camping on the public right-of-way, like on the sidewalk or in other areas that are intended for people to move back and forth.”

Chief Operating Officer Andrew Persons said parks already have hours posted, and being in a park after hours is already against the law, but it would be useful if the Commission could differentiate between “camping versus sleeping, like in a park, for instance, during the day.” He said most of the complaints received by the City are for people “who are actually camping on the public right-of-way, like on the sidewalk or in other areas that are intended for people to move back and forth.”

Mayor Harvey Ward said he thought it would be appropriate to give direction to staff to “see what other cities have come across with this… I don’t want us to be out there on a limb with the only city trying to solve this.”

Pedestrian safety in medians

Mann said the second half of the agenda item concerned safety in medians because a majority of the 16 pedestrian fatalities from 2022 to 2024 were in a median where there was no crosswalk: “How do we improve the safety of our medians? We already have an ordinance on the books that prohibits pedestrians from being in the median if the median is six feet or less,” but GPD has found that injuries and fatalities in medians are unrelated to the width of the median, “and so, for our Vision Zero program, the recommendation is to prohibit people from being in the median unless there’s a specific purpose, such as being in a crosswalk or a sidewalk that’s in the median, or some other type of pedestrian area.”

Ward: “I don’t think it is safe for people to be in medians longer than it takes to take a respite across the road.”

Ward said his concern was “entirely about safety… I don’t think it is safe for people to be in medians longer than it takes to take a respite across the road.” He said most people who are panhandling or otherwise engaging with cars in a median are not usually in the center: “They’re going over to the edge of the median.”

Eastman said he was comfortable reviewing the median ordinance but wasn’t ready to make changes to the public camping ordinance. 

Book made a motion to refer both of the ordinances to the City Attorney and staff to review and bring back best practices. Chestnut seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-2, with Commissioners Willits and Eastman in dissent.

Duncan-Walker: “I think about the advocates for those who are unhoused and how I don’t see any of them in our chamber today, and I would love it if we would intentionally make them a part of this decision-making process.”

Commissioner Desmon Duncan-Walker said she would like to “bring the community into this conversation [about the public camping ordinance]… I think about the advocates for those who are unhoused and how I don’t see any of them in our chamber today, and I would love it if we would intentionally make them a part of this decision-making process… They’re going to be some of the people who we will have to rely on to make sure that, as best we can, we are going to be able to minimize the harmful impacts on our houseless neighbors.” 

Eastman made a motion to direct staff to “engage with the community to determine the impact to stakeholders and return to the Commission with that information when that comes forward.” Duncan-Walker seconded the motion, and the motion passed unanimously.

  • Just listen to the wording these folks use. It’s right out of the “woke” playbook. The “unhoused”? Seriously? And the reason Gainesville is inundated with the homeless is because our commissioners constantly put out the welcome mat for them. The same thing happened to the country under Biden with illegal migrants. The welcome mat was put out and we were inundated with millions of the uncouth and unwashed masses from third world countries. I would advise the City of Gainesville commissioners to pay close attention to the state law REQUIRING them to remove the homeless from public places. I’m just waiting for someone to file a massive lawsuit against the city.

    • “Woke” is the 1st word in the MAGA PC dictionary. Let’s stick to the facts and issues.

      The homeless are the least likely to travel to pick out a new “home”. They don’t subscribe to Zillow. Immigrants come here looking for work, just like our ancestors did. That’s why ICE hangs out at Home Depots and tomato fields.

      We agree that the GCC needs to pay attention to the state law on camping, and part of that is having an alternative. That’s exactly what Grace is and you all hate that.

      Maybe stop and think about the fact that any city of size and with resources will have homeless in America and this is a relatively new problem due to changes in laws 40 years ago on holding people against their will in mental institutions. Then come up with a plan you can favor. Pretending that only Gainesville has it is BS or that Grace is more expensive and a legal alternative to jail shows the bankruptcy of your thought on a real problem.

      • Wow. Jazzy, there you go again. You claim that someone who uses common sense is MAGA since that is YOUR 1st word in the PC dictionary. Do you EVER get tired of regurgitating liberal talking points? We don’t ‘hate’ GRACE. What we hate is the lax security and vetting process with residents there. We hate that law enforcement is constantly responding to fights/stabbings/etc there. We hate that almost on a daily basis, in the LOCAL crime reporting, we find out that a homeless person is a resident of GRACE. Get your facts straight before making a blanket statement about what we like and hate. Also, quite a LARGE percentage of illegal immigrants (notice you didn’t use THAT word) coming here are NOT coming for work. They’re coming for handouts. The Biden administration made a concerted effort to welcome MILLIONS of ILLEGAL immigrants by giving them free housing/medical/phones/money. And as for the laws that changed about housing people against their will in mental institutions that is YOUR party to blame for that one. Y’all complained and petitioned and abolished it and then have the temerity to say NIMBY when homeless people with OBVIOUS mental issues come into your city. You’re all hot air who constantly regurgitates liberal talking points.

        • Other Bob, putting aside the clear fact that many to most posting here hate that Grace exists and resist any funding for it, and the pollyanna idea that someone might run a shelter for drug addicts, mental patients, traumatized vets, the physically and mentally maimed, lifelong criminals of varying capacity for violence, along with a handful of just short term down on their luck unemployed citizens in a camp of relative peace and order, what is your plan? Since you speak for uncounted MAGA others, what is their plan besides constant bitching and howling at the moon?

          As to the overturning of forceable holdings of the mentally ill, it was at least partly a bi-partisan effort with major legislation passed by JFK, Reagan among others cutting facilities, and the conservative Burger SC ruling unanimously on an important case. One can understand a conservative civil liberties argument against forcible detainment of citizens without a crime and the period when that was possible – most of our past – abounds with real abuses, nightmares, and wherehousing of people with no rights. Don’t be so sure you want to go back there.

          As to “talking points”, I don’t read them and don’t know where I’d get them. I read the news and enough to mostly draw my own conclusions (no human thought is likely original). I recommend it if you’re interested in issues.

          https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2024/04/16/1244702372/could-the-u-s-force-treatment-on-mentally-ill-people-again

          https://www.oyez.org/cases/1974/74-8?utm_source=npr_newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_content=20240415&utm_term=9401413&utm_campaign=money&utm_id=46658268&orgid=309&utm_att1=

          PS An interesting book – especially for Floridians – is “Beneath a Relentless Sun” by Gilbert King concerning a retarded teenager falsely arrested for rape in the Leesburg area in 1957 by a corrupt sheriff who knew what he was doing, and held for about 20 years in Chattahoochee. The same author wrote “Devil In the Grove” concerning a notorious rape case in the same area (Lake County) in 1949 and with the same corrupt sherrif. It won the Pulitzer Prize when written (about 2016).

        • PS Other Bob: On immigrants, yeah some are criminals (but many less than the perecentage among native born Americans), some get welfare payments (but much less than native born Americans), and some even get housing (but less than native born Americans) but the overwhelming majority came here to work and do just that. We need them for our economy because we are not reproducing at replacemen numbers. Removing them not only means higher prices for tomatoes and houses but a slipping GDP and loss of competetive points in the world economy.

          Here is the Cato Institue:

          “Congress is currently debating whether to spend about $175 billion on deportations to avoid future payments like the $650 million that Congress spent on shelter and other services for migrants last year. Poorly spending $650 million last year doesn’t justify spending 269 times as much to avoid similarly relatively small costs when Congress could just decide not to spend the money on migrant shelter and services in the first place.”

          https://www.cato.org/blog/immigrants-used-less-welfare-native-born-americans-2022

          Think about it. Removing immigrants who are contributing to our economy and society will hurt us, not help us and the overwhelming majority of these people are hard workers seeking what our ancestors did. It is a lie repeated daily by Trump that countries are emptying out jails and mental institutions. His specialty is telling us how terrible everything is and scaring people.

          “There is no evidence that the Venezuelan government is systemically or selectively releasing prisoners and expelling them from the country.

          It’s a highly unlikely scenario for at least two reasons: The authorities have a relatively weak handle on the prison system and they are actually encouraging Venezuelans to return to the country…”

          https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/31/world/americas/trump-crime-venezuela-us.html

          “Donald Trump has repeatedly claimed that millions of immigrants crossing the southern U.S. border were intentionally released from overseas jails, prisons and asylums, especially in countries like Venezuela.These claims have been routinely debunked by journalists, researchers and fact-checkers. Pressed multiple times, Trump’s campaign has not been able to corroborate the claims, making it difficult to fact-check something that may not exist….”

          https://www.themarshallproject.org/2024/10/21/fact-check-12000-trump-statements-immigrants/emptying_prisons_jails_mental_institutions#emptying_prisons_jails_mental_institutions

      • 8 thumbs down so far and no plan for what to do in the real world about homeless people.

        Pathetic

    • I prefer Neal Boortz’ term ‘Urban Outdoorsmen’ to the ‘the unhoused’…..

  • Willits: “God forbid I ever fall asleep in the beautiful sun rays of a November day or March day, out on the plaza.” God forbid this idiot from ever holding public office again. Doubtful his child gets up each morning and says, “I wanna be an idiot like daddy when I grow up.”
    My suggestion is let the homeless stay “overnight” in Willets’ yard, he’ll figure out how to define “overnight.”

    Next suggestion, make it policy a dictionary gets issued to all GPD officers. One would expect them to know what “overnight” entails.

    Duncan-Walker, “I think about the advocates for those who are unhoused and how I don’t see any of them in our chamber today, and I would love it if we would intentionally make them a part of this decision-making process.” They were a part of the decision making process – they voted for this group of incompetents and played a role in the burgeoning homeless population. Did she really think they would be present to show their true hypocrisy? As long as they’re not in their yards, they’re okay with it.

    In closing, anyone else find it a little coincidental the group who has invited and increased the homeless population, is having difficulties defining the requirements that were put in place to prevent that same population from inhabiting public spaces?

    • To You Voted for It,
      You are spot on! The police want a definition because they want their arrests to stick. The liberal judges will let the people go when the definition of “overnight” is argued in court. The police have a tough job in this town. Just another example of how messed up our leadership is. I had to roll my eyes when I read Wilits comment. He is in over his head.
      Just another meeting that leaves us embarrassed for our leadership. What a Clown Town.

      • Maybe you 2 geniuses don’t understand that legal language – you know, the kind where they take your house or throw you in jail – has to be precise or the judge can’t do anything. Think about it.

        • Still waiting for your answers to one of the two questions posed earlier you hypocritical denier.
          Think about that.

        • A tent isn’t a house.
          Doesn’t take a genius to know that.

          If they pooled all their government benefits together maybe they can buy a community property and share.

    • Willits has a condo, no yard. Maybe Duncan and Chestnut can donate used coffins for public campers.

  • You can’t text while driving, it’s an unsafe distraction. You can’t hold a phone while driving, it’s an unsafe distraction. Well the homeless in the road medians are also unsafe distractions. You can’t concentrate on traffic if you are worried about what they are going to do. It should be completely illegal.

  • Way back in the UF days I was studying at the Public Library on University when I put my head down for a minute in a study kiosk. A big employee came up behind me and kicked my chair telling me sternly ‘no sleeping’. I was no derelict….How times have changed.

  • It should NOT be complaint driven. Use common sense for a change, on campers and repeat vagrants. Yes, you can legislate them away to another county or state.
    And replace the commie commission with normal representatives.

  • We are almost there. Almost Portland. Clown after clown elected by clowns. City, County, School Board. Bums on every corner. The cancer has spread to every street corner .

  • There are many ways to deal with the homeless other than by just what is legislated. It seem like GPD is “on their heels” on this issue – waiting for clarification on what they can or cannot do. About 20 years ago many of us worked hard to clean up downtown, city streets, and intersections. The citizens were happy and so were the businesses. Unfortunately, our work resulted in Gainesville being voted the “5th meanest city in the US to homeless.” The city commission and city manager lost their minds, and all of our progress was lost. There is no reason to include the homeless in ANY discussions. Enforce the laws and ordinances AGGRESSIVELY and use courteous intimidation to get the results required by the community. Unfortunately, I believe that the proverbial genie is out of the bottle and Gainesville doesn’t have the fortitude to handle this situation properly.

  • If the meeting and agenda was posted, and included the camping and median issues, “the community” was there. You can’t hold meetings where “stakeholders” – in this case they don’t have houses or stakes – get special notifications and expect the public is fairly represented.

  • Talk is cheap….Show us the enforcement and maybe we can believe you….. for once.

  • This reminds me of when Waldo had strict speed enforcement. You know, enforce the laws. Lots of drivers were upset that they would get a ticket for not following the clearly posted speed limit. So, the Waldo police were dismantled and drivers now race through the area.

    GCC wants to invite the equivalent of speeders to discuss how to “engage” them in enforcing speed limit laws. Idiots.

    If the bums just slept I don’t think anyone would care. But type the word homeless into the archive search and you’ll see there’s a history of violent and destructive ones in the city. The GCC should try engaging with them to see how to accommodate their need to break windows and walk around naked.

  • Everyone needs a place to stay. So if you came into circumstances where you had no place to stay, wouldn’t you hope for help? I moved to this area thinking I would be around Christians, I am seeing the opposite. From what I have seen in the south it’s anything but Christian. No I am not homeless, but I do give food to them hopefully to give them a leg up. For those of you who distain the homeless, I hope you never have to experience their pain.

    • I don’t think everyone here hates the homeless. What I hate is Grace’s open-door policy and GCC’s welcome mat and inept handling of the nuts breaking windows and attacking people.

      For every uncivilized criminal Grace lets onto their property that’s one less spot for someone who will really do something with the opportunity, specially the homeless women who would like to NOT be threatened with rape at knifepoint (search the archives).

  • Everything they do is directed by the lawyers who want cases to go to the courts and get appealed over an over. Just to feed lawyer members of the ACLUSPLCDNC 👹👿🇮🇱🤡👺💩

  • >