Gainesville City Commission reviews initial budget gap of $7.5 million, votes to explore a franchise fee for GRU

The Gainesville City Commission held a special meeting on March 26

BY JENNIFER CABRERA

GAINESVILLE, Fla. – At a March 26 special meeting, the Gainesville City Commission voted to allocate $5 million in excess fund balance to 8th & Waldo, learned that the City’s initial FY2027 budget has a $7.5 million gap, voted to ask the GRU Authority for a joint meeting, and asked staff to explore the City’s ability to impose a franchise fee on GRU.

After adopting the FY2025 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report, which marked the third consecutive year with no audit findings, the Commission unanimously reaffirmed and approved the City’s existing Strategic Plan. 

FY2027 budget estimates

Allison Teslia, Director of the Office of Management and Budget, kicked off the FY2027 budget development process by announcing that the starting point for next year’s budget includes an estimated revenue of $164.8 million, which is $2.8 million or 1.7% higher than the FY2026 adopted budget. That assumes that the millage rate will stay flat at 6.7297 mills and that the GRU Authority would continue a Government Services Contribution (GSC) of about $7.2 million. 

Initial revenue estimates for FY2027 (click to enlarge)

FY2027 expenditures are estimated at $172 million, so the current budget gap is about $7.5 million.

Initial summary of the FY2027 General Fund budget (click to enlarge)

Teslia said the City’s fund balance policy requires a maximum fund balance (unassigned funds) of $40.5 million, but the current General Fund fund balance is $49.9 million, giving Commissioners about $9.4 million in available funds; staff recommended setting aside $5 million from the fund balance for the 8th & Waldo project.

Mayor Harvey Ward: “For anyone who might be curious or worried, seeing that there is a gap at this point, we will, as we are required by law, pass a balanced budget when all is said and done. In my experience, we always start out with a gap, and we figure it out over the course of the next several months; that’s what this process is.”

Mayor Harvey Ward said that Commissioners had already tentatively agreed to that $5 million figure the last time they had the 8th & Waldo discussion, “so this is just to remind everybody that’s not new… And for anyone who might be curious or worried, seeing that there is a gap at this point, we will, as we are required by law, pass a balanced budget when all is said and done. In my experience, we always start out with a gap, and we figure it out over the course of the next several months; that’s what this process is.”

Commissioner Bryan Eastman noted that last year, the Commission used about $7 million in excess fund balance to balance the budget. He asked, “Why is staff recommending that we commit to this so early in the process?” Interim City Manager Andrew Persons said the Commission could wait until they have more precise revenue estimates to make that decision.

Commissioner Cynthia Chestnut said she would prefer “to earmark the funds and set them aside… That’s what we made a commitment to do… I don’t want to start tinkering with the funds in any way.”

Ward agreed, “I agree with Commissioner Chestnut. We essentially have committed this, because we voted for the ladder of funding for everything at 8th and Waldo at a previous meeting. And this affirms that more clearly.” He said they could put the money back “if something horrible happens.” 

Unfunded capital needs identified by staff (click to enlarge)

Referring to a list of capital needs, Commissioner Ed Book said, “We’ve had some situations where we have buildings and structures — merely because we weren’t maintaining them,… it costs us more in the long run. And so our fiscal responsibility is to try and maintain things.” He asked which funding sources are available to fund those capital needs, and Interim Chief Operating Officer Brian Singleton said, “Our main funding source is the General Fund for a lot of these items. So, balancing the budget and being as lean as possible is really the preferred option.”

Book said he supported 3% annual merit increases for staff and did not support a millage increase or a fire assessment fee increase. He suggested scheduling a joint meeting with the GRU Authority to discuss the GSC and the deductions the Authority has made from the starting amount of $8.5 million. 

Eastman also said he was not interested in raising taxes this year: “I think we need to give people a sense of calm on that. But there’s a bunch of unknowns that we have lingering out there:… the Government Services Contribution, property tax reform,… we’ve been overdue for a slowdown in the economy for a little while… — and I would like to have money set aside for a rainy day.”

First motion

Chestnut made a motion to approve setting aside $5 million from the excess fund balance from the General Fund to the 8th and Waldo project and to schedule a meeting with the GRU Authority to begin to develop the budget. Commissioner Casey Willits seconded the motion.

Persons said he would be meeting with GRU CEO Ed Bielarski soon to discuss a variety of items, and “certainly, the GSC is top of the list for us.” He said his staff would try to schedule a joint meeting with the Authority.

The motion passed 6-1, with Eastman in dissent.

Eastman later clarified that his vote was against transferring $5 million out of the excess fund balance; he said he supported having a meeting with the GRU Authority.

Second motion 

Commissioner James Ingle: “I think [a franchise fee] would be a solid number that we can actually count on, and based on something with an actual formula, instead of just randomly whatever is coming out of GRU.”

Commissioner James Ingle said that the GSC can “change with the wind,… [so] I think it would make a lot of sense to move forward with the process of establishing franchise fees. That way, it will be something that is concrete, not something to be changed at a whim by either board… I think that would be a solid number that we can actually count on, and based on something with an actual formula, instead of just randomly whatever is coming out of GRU.” He made a motion to direct the City Manager and the City Attorney’s Office to bring back information on what it would take to start the process of putting a franchise fee into effect.

Willits said he would support the motion because he wanted to know how franchise fees would fit in with the City’s Charter and state law. 

The motion passed unanimously.

Third motion

Ingle also made a motion to ask staff to bring back a report on how peer cities handle exemptions for fire assessments. He said the current exemptions total about half a million dollars, “everything from small nonprofits to Shands Hospital.” Willits seconded the motion.

Ward said, “I would note that no matter how much we ask to tax Shands Hospital, we don’t get to tax Shands Hospital.” Ingle said, “We can’t tax them, but they can pay a fire assessment fee,” and Ward said, “That’s a good point. I think they probably still will say, ‘Thanks so much, but no,’ but we’ll see.”

The motion passed unanimously.

During a subsequent discussion about the Government Services Contribution, Willits said, “There’s no guarantee. They could just have an extra $1.1 million or whatever in their coffers, and they could just give their CEO a pay raise. They could buy a bigger flag for public events. Who knows what they would want to use that for?… 100%, it’s a choice on their part… If anyone is playing a game, it’s them.”

With no further motions, Ward moved on to the next agenda item, which will be covered in a separate article.

  • $7.5 million budget gap, but NO willingness by the Mayor and City Commissioners to cut their fiscally irresponsible and wasteful spending?

    Ridiculous Statement # 1:

    He [Book] suggested scheduling a joint meeting with the GRU Authority to discuss the GSC and the deductions the Authority has made from the starting amount of $8.5 million. 

    Ridiculous Statement # 2:

    Commissioner James Ingle: “I think [a franchise fee] would be a solid number that we can actually count on, and based on something with an actual formula, instead of just randomly whatever is coming out of GRU.”

    The GSC is not negotiable and the City can’t impose a franchise fee on a utility owned by the City.

    • The commission must not have read the state law that created the GRUAB. Clearly states:

      “No franchise, right-of-way, license, permit or usage
      fee or tax may be levied by the City upon the Authority or the
      utilities unless allowed by general law.”

      • “…unless allowed by general law” means we need to find that out? Why isn’t it applicable since Authority acts independently of the city and was a taking of property.

        Utility franchise fees in Florida are charges that utility companies pay to local governments (cities or counties) in exchange for the right to use public rights-of-way — things like roads, sidewalks, and easements — to run their infrastructure (power lines, gas pipes, water lines, etc.).
        How they work
        A local government grants a utility company an exclusive or semi-exclusive franchise to operate within its jurisdiction. In return, the utility pays a percentage of its gross revenues to the municipality. These fees are typically passed through directly to customers on their utility bills, so in practice, residents and businesses end up footing the cost.
        Typical rates
        Florida municipalities commonly charge franchise fees in the range of 5–6% of gross revenues for electric utilities, though rates vary by locality and utility type. Natural gas, cable/telecom, and water/sewer utilities may carry different rates set by individual franchise agreements.
        Legal framework
        Florida doesn’t set a uniform statewide franchise fee rate. Instead, local governments negotiate agreements individually with each utility under their general home rule powers. The Florida Public Service Commission (PSC) regulates investor-owned utilities but generally doesn’t set franchise fee rates — that’s left to the local franchise agreements.

    • An after-the-fact franchise fee cannot be unilaterally imposed on any utility since that would amount to an illegal tax.

      • A recurring debate in Florida is whether franchise fees are a legitimate infrastructure access charge or effectively a hidden tax. Critics argue they’re a way for municipalities to generate revenue without calling it a tax, since they don’t require the same political process as a formal tax increase.
        If FPL and Duke energy pay fees to municipalities then so should GRU Authority, semantics of tax v fees aside

    • Translation; Eastman – it’s an election cycle, let’s spin it down but promise the moon. SAIEW…

  • Is anyone shocked about a franchise fee want to charge shands for fire protection? I’m surprised they didn’t come out with an extra Income Tax for people make over a half million a year. Its the Democratic way why don’t they cut some of these outrageous salaries they pay these people in positions that they don’t need.

    • Shocked we have so much freeloading, a fee is for the service that we are providing. 50 million in fire station replacements listed….when did pay your fair share become a bad thing?

  • So typical of the extremely poor governance of both the city and the county.The very first thought is where can we get more money? No discussion of where can we save the taxpayers money. The legislature has stated the GRU is no longer your bottomless piggybank. You need to look at UNNECCASSARY serices and wasted money. The building of the GREC plant and the poor leaders we have have turned gainesville from one of the cheapest, best places to live to what we have now. Yet they are have an insaitiable need for more spending. It would be nice to have commissioners (both city and couty) that actually did what we all want. Government that provides needed services in a reasonable and cost effective manner. We spend an enormous amount of TAX DOLLARS on social projects. In this day of high and higher taxes we need to assess whether we can afford what they are doing. I am a home owner in this county. I have seen my property taxes almost double in the last 5 years. This is unsustainable.

  • Hello, the state gave them a list of cuts last year, they don’t even need to discuss the cuts.

  • Here’s all one needs to know about their fiscal irresponsibility: “The starting point for next year’s budget includes an estimated revenue of $164.8 million, which is $2.8 million or 1.7% higher than the FY2026 adopted budget.”
    “Initial revenue estimates for FY2027 expenditures are estimated at $172 million, so the current budget gap is about $7.5 million.”

    What do people not understand about that picture?

  • Sadly this Commission will try anything to get more money out of GRU. The State seen how they mismanaged money, so they took the GRU
    candy away from them and they have been pouting ever since.

  • Harvey – Try a Zero Base Budget model and you may see that you do in fact have enough money to finance the City of
    Gainesville but hands off “OUR” GRU (finally – “our” – love that word!!!). Booya!

  • Under capital needs, new projects:

    1. what’s this $300k for RTS bus stop recycling cans? Are they those expensive solar garbage cans?

    Every bus stop should just have a regular public non-solar concrete garbage can so citizens can put refuse blowing around in the city in its proper place… The panhandlers and vagrants always seem to miss putting the trash in the can gator fan!

    2. Fire station replacement $50 mil, Fire training TBD…shouldn’t that come out of the fire assessment fee?

    Does this mean they will be planning to quadruple Our current fire assessment fees to meet a pie in the sky future demand of fire station replacements? What goes wrong with concrete block fire stations? Don’t tell me mold.

  • Common problem with the posters on this subject is they think the legislature or county residents own GRU. They don’t, but they can probably buy it from the citizens of Gainesville who built it and have owned for 100 years.

    Pony up deadbeats or shut up.

        • Nobody alive in the city has paid anything for their government’s ownership of GRU. They inherited it.

          • Steve, putting aside your advocacy for claiming property other people inherited, Gainesville citizens pay taxes and are responsible for GRUs debts, maintenance, etc. When it operates with profits, that is a testament to what the city built, not the county or the state.

    • Maybe you should stick with what Concerned Citizen said. I think that sums it up for the city commission. I wonder if Ward and company should stay with what works best for them. Lame causes like the No Kings protest they boost about.

    • Sir, I sincerely hope you don’t take offense to this, but I want you to know that I am praying for you. Some of your recent messages come across as though you may be carrying frustration or anger.

      I share this with respect, because holding onto anger often harms us more than anyone else—it’s like drinking poison and expecting the other person to suffer. My hope is for peace and clarity for you moving forward.

    • Jaz , I’ve told you 100 damn times stop GRU at the damn city limit sign lose 40% your customers and let them go with a different company and see how much you like the increase rate you’ll be paying

      • I’m in the county and GRU is the best utility company I’ve had in my 53 years paying them or Clay, so in my opinion the losers in your scenario would be you and the other whiners here who think they already own GRU. You don’t. Suck it up and lobby the county to buy it or find another utility provider.

        By the way when the GRU rip-off passed the state House, Rep Hinson offered an amendment to let county residents opt out of GRU. All the GOP pols voted it down.

  • Franchise fee? For what? Previously making GRU rates one of the highest in the state? Sneaky money grabbing bastards

  • Leave that cash cow alone Harvey! If the commission cannot live under a realistic budget (as we have to) then it’s time for new leadership.

  • The Supreme Court has ruled in the case of the Alachua County “Privilege Fee” that allowing free use of Rights of Way cannot be undone by way of subsequent imposition of a Franchise Fee. GRU currently ignores City requirements for Permits and associated fees in City Rights of Way. Such fees would be added to GRU bills already subject to pyramided utility taxes and would be borne by RATEPAYERS. Free use of City and County Rights of Way are shown as an asset on GRU Financial Statements worth over $800,000.

  • Typical democrat, instead of cutting the budget for the crap they want to spend it on they find more ways to tax the citizens.

  • So many of you do not understand, or choose to not understand that they intend to explore that franchise fee as a replacement to the current “hope GRU contributes” to the city that owns it. That way there is a calculated amount that is reliable and understandable and based on actual metrics. The current transfer process is totally up to the whims of the GRUA. The example that they could give the CEO a raise, or maybe do like JEA and all the top tier get huge bonuses and there is no way for anyone to stop that. None.

    What if you owned a Kangaroo just inside the city limits. The state doesn’t like the way you run it, you’re “treating the county resident bad”. So they take the control of it away from you give it to a handpicked management team. Now that team can give you some of the profits or keep the to do what they feel like. Now how do you feel?

  • >