Garrett: $30 million and our students still won’t have a field to call their own

Letter to the editor

On Tuesday, June 16, at 5:30 p.m., the Alachua County School Board will meet to discuss the proposed purchase of Citizens Field from the City of Gainesville. Before the Board signs a contract that could saddle taxpayers and students with decades of financial and environmental risk, the public needs to understand what is actually being proposed and what is being ignored.

The pitch sounds simple: purchase and renovate Citizens Field so that Buchholz, Eastside, and Gainesville High School have a shared athletic facility. The estimated cost is $30 million. But a closer look reveals a deal that appears to benefit the City far more than our students.

The costs begin before construction even starts

The School Board would pay $500,000 to purchase the stadium, a price that does not include the surrounding land used for parking. The Board would also be responsible for half of an estimated $5 million in environmental remediation costs, bringing the pre-construction tab to a minimum of $3 million, before a single shovel hits the ground.

The City has classified Citizens Field as a brownfield, a designation that signals known or suspected contamination. That alone should give the Board pause. But the contract makes it worse. The cost-sharing arrangement explicitly does not cover any environmental remediation that may be necessary on the Citizens Field property itself after purchase. If asbestos is found in the stadium structure, or any other contaminants are discovered during demolition, those costs fall entirely outside the agreement. The School Board would have no contractual protection. Purchasing an off-campus brownfield with this level of unknown liability would be unprecedented for a Florida school district.

Three schools sharing one field is not a solution

Eastside, Buchholz, and Gainesville High have been forced to share athletic facilities for far too long, and it has real consequences for students. This is not just a football issue. It affects soccer, track, lacrosse, cheerleading, band, graduations, and pep rallies. There is no evidence that any other county in Florida has three large high schools sharing a single athletic facility. Every other county has found a way to give each school a home. Why are Alachua County students still being asked to accept less?

The shared arrangement also costs student programs real money, year after year. Buchholz alone spends over $20,000 annually busing students and equipment to Citizens Field. Eastside and Gainesville High face similar costs. Because the field is shared, sponsorship banners cannot be sold, costing each program an estimated $5,000 per year. Concession revenue suffers because volunteers must haul food and supplies for every game. And because the School Board would not control the surrounding parking under this contract, parking revenue would continue flowing to the City, not to the schools. All told, the shared Citizens Field model costs student programs an estimated $40,000 per year per school, or $120,000 across all three. That money should be going to athletes and programs, not to buses and missed revenue.

There are better alternatives that have not been seriously explored

Eastside High School has significant land available for a stadium upgrade. Buchholz also has room for expansion. A real feasibility study might reveal that upgrading both campuses costs less than the $30 million being proposed for Citizens Field, while giving each school something Citizens Field can never provide: a home field of their own. The School Board could also explore building on land it already owns, eliminating purchase costs entirely. Gainesville High could share temporarily with a neighboring school while a longer-term solution is developed. That is not ideal, but it is still better than what is being proposed now.

Has the Board commissioned a feasibility study comparing these options? Has anyone done a side-by-side analysis of upgrading Eastside and Buchholz versus purchasing Citizens Field? If that work has been done, the public has not seen it. If it has not been done, it must be completed before any contract is signed.

This deal serves the City’s interests, not our students’ interests

Citizens Field has been a financial challenge for the City of Gainesville for years. This proposed sale transfers that burden to the School Board, along with environmental uncertainty, off-campus logistics, and the ongoing costs of a three-school sharing arrangement that has never worked well and will not work better simply because the stadium gets a renovation.

Our students deserve fields they can call their own. They deserve the school pride, the convenience, and the financial benefits that come with a home campus facility. Eastside deserves a home field. So does Buchholz. So does GHS.

On Tuesday evening, the School Board has an opportunity to pause, ask hard questions, and demand that real alternatives be explored before committing $30 million of taxpayer money to a deal that carries significant risk and uncertain benefit for students. The community should show up, speak up, and make clear that our students deserve better than a rushed decision that serves the City’s budget before it serves our kids.

The meeting is Tuesday, June 16, at 5:30 p.m., in the Boardroom at the District Office, 620 East University Avenue. Write to the board. Be there.

Jenn Garrett

The opinions expressed by letter or opinion writers are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of AlachuaChronicle.com. Assertions of facts in letters are similarly the responsibility of the author. Letters may be submitted to info@alachuachronicle.com and are published at the discretion of the editor.

  • Excellent, sensible letter with obvious facts that MUST be considered. Don’t do it School Board.

  • I agree with Jenn. Even in the best of circumstances, this is not a good proposal. There will be no pride in the facility by any of the schools. In actuality, the project as discussed by the school board is overly complicated, risky, and too expensive.

  • Can the County and School Board collaborate on the purchase of the City of Gainesville golf course? The golf course is a financial liability to the City with a net loss. The size of the property is large enough to contain several different ball fields (baseball, softball, soccer, football, etc) plus parking and concessions.

    During the off season the fields can generate revenue from amateur league games and concessions for the County while the high school games will have a space large enough for multiple fields.

    • Someone must be dreaming. Our liberal leaders have no interest or intention of making ANYTHING profitable. To them profit is a dirty word just like TAXES is a dirty word for conservatives. Additionally, do you really think that amateur leagues would want to pay to play on the crime ridden Eastside of town? If I had a choice I would go to Newberry or Ocala instead.

    • Hell no!!! Let the County and City figure it out. Leave the school money with the actual
      Schools.

  • $30 million for a high school football stadium by the airport and $1.5 billion for a college football stadium renovation. We live in retardo land. Idiocracy has come to life right here in Gainesville. But more government, right?….

  • Since when hasn’t the City sought to manipulate agreements more for its benefit than Joe Public’s? This isn’t a new occurrence, just more smoke and mirrors masquerading as a so-called “benefit”.

    Thanks Ms Garrett, for putting in black and white the true colors and hidden costs to the SBAC and taxpayers.

  • Where I come from each high school had their own stadium that included grandstand seating on both sides and a track around the football field. Concession stands were built into the structures under the seating areas. Plenty of parking was available and multiple events throughout the year were held there. Were the stadiums built in this area small afterthoughts from the start?

  • ‘Brownfield’????
    “Purchasing an off-campus brownfield with this level of unknown liability would be unprecedented for a Florida school district.”

    Are the phase 1 and 2 environmental assessments available to the public? This sounds like a 1st order fustercluck of Pegeen magnitude.

    • You mean like the former Depot Park brownfield? Real train wreck there…that is sarcasm.
      Is it better policy to just ignore it like we’re doing at the former Koppers wood treatment site?
      Yes due diligence is paramount. Abandonment is not the answer.

  • They should just use the fields on their school grounds…it’s just some kids playing ball…no need to get so fancy.

    It’s A boondoggle and waste of taxpayer money…

    the kids can’t read at grade level and we have other pressing issues like a “ homeless crime emergency”..

    Fix that and then we can talk about wasting taxpayer money on unnecessary BS like a stadium..

    Hey DeSantis, the ACSB has so much property tax money that they’re building stadiums…can you exempt people who don’t have any children from paying school tax? Parents need to pay their fare share for their kids in the system…a user fee sounds good
    To me…bet the kids read at grade level then…

    • All the more reason to say NO to Citizens Field and YES to improving current fields at the schools for a heck of a lot less money.

  • Does a $1/yr lease the city gives the school board in exchange for managing the facility, including field and facility maintenance costs cause city financial strain? I think it benefits both parties.
    Those clamoring for a total redo should reconsider what is truly necessary, are we really too sensitive that we can’t sit on a concrete slab for a couple of hours to support our kids and school? Save the bones of the stadium.
    Savings from transportation costs mentioned would be eaten up by field maintenance. Game day/stadium field isn’t a daily practice field so that should be taken into account.
    Having played there ‘70’s and watched my kids play there a combined 18 sport/seasons I’d like the tradition to continue despite some flaws and necessary work arounds.

    • So your tradition is more important than actual current students having a small scale upgraded stadium at their own school? What about their traditions? What about their high school experiences? How very self-centered of you. Citizens field is a dump snd a disaster and has been for decades.

      • Ask the players about it. The ones I’ve talked to were excited about the opportunity to play at Citizens. The field holding water after heavy rains can be resolved. My kids experienced it and were happy to play there is the basis of my comment. Ruined experience? come on, if an aging facility ruins it the program has real problems.
        What are the costs related to Santa Fe HS stadium facility in Alachua, is that what we’re talking about? That’s a big footprint for any high school campus.

  • 30 million to improve an under used and outdated stadium. What is not mentioned is the fact that during JV & Varsity games there, gangbangers roam the stands and parking lot (usually armed) looking for trouble.
    Don’t believe it, count the GPD cars and officers there on any given game night.
    The last thing the tax payers need is a ‘memorial shrine’ to some do nothing politician that can toot their own horn over wasted tax money.
    Don’t believe it, does Leveda Brown or the Junior brothers ring any bells?

    • You don’t have to keep being a Bumpkin. We’re rooting for you.
      “Studies consistently show this fear is statistically irrational — young Black men are far more likely to be victims of violence than perpetrators against strangers, particularly white strangers. The fear reflects social mythology more than actual risk.

      Scholars like Carol Anderson (White Rage), Jennifer Eberhardt (Biased), and Michelle Alexander (The New Jim Crow) have traced how these fears are socially produced and politically weaponized.”

  • >