GRU Authority hears update on budget, deadlocks on moving City fees off utility bills
BY JENNIFER CABRERA
Updated on May 14 with additional information about billing the City fees on GRU bills and statement from the Gainesville City Manager.
GAINESVILLE, Fla. – At the May 13 Gainesville Regional Utilities Authority meeting, CEO Ed Bielarski explained how the utility evaluates its assets and previewed the budget; the Authority deadlocked on the question of moving City stormwater and solid waste fees from utility bills to property tax bills, leading the City to announce that these fees will appear on property tax bills in the future.
GRU has received a $42.9 million grant for grid resilience
After a member of the public asked about volatility in oil and gas prices and “aging equipment,” Bielarski gave a presentation about the utility’s continuous efforts to evaluate its generation assets.
Bielarski announced that GRU has received a Grid Resilience and Innovation Partnerships (GRIP) grant of $42.9 million, which will be used over the next five years to replace substation transformers and outdated circuit breakers, replace wooden poles with ductile iron poles, implement an advanced distribution management system, harden distribution lines, and upgrade a line that currently runs between Archer and the Parker substation. Bielarski said GRU received the grant “because of the strength of our programs and how much we adhere to reliability and safety.”
Bielarski said the utility has “a proactive and predictive maintenance program” with a “track record of retrofitting and extending the longevity of assets.” He said 102 people at GRU work on the reliability of the utility’s generating assets and the continuous improvement of its plants. These employees replace critical electric control systems and perform tests such as thermal imaging of breakers and transformers, oil analysis, vibration analysis, load testing, ultrasonic boiler testing, generator partial discharge analysis, high-energy piping support, and cybersecurity upgrades.
In 2020, GRU extended the life of the combined cycle unit at Kelly by 30 years by replacing a steam turbine generator. In 2021, GRU converted Deerhaven 2 to dual fuels, which improves the reliability of the plant and adds fuel diversity. In 2022, the condition of Deerhaven 1 was assessed to determine the necessary steps to extend its life. In 2023, GRU conducted an inspection of Deerhaven Renewable’s steam turbine, and cracked turbine blades were replaced before they failed. Bielarski said that both the Kelly and Deerhaven 2 investments had paid off within three years, and the dual-fuel conversion avoided a million tons of CO2 emissions.
Recently, the utility has entered into short-term Power Purchase Agreements to take advantage of lower-cost power and availability, enabling the older plants to run at a lower rate and extending their lives.
Bielarski said, “I hope you’re getting the idea that these folks aren’t Homer Simpson, sitting behind the control booth in one of the plants. [Our people] are engaged, and they’re out there giving us the best value that the community can have.”
Bielarski also said that the former IRP (Integrated Resource Plan) is “irrelevant now” because of increased costs for equipment and the backlog for turbines due to data center demand. He continued, “I mean, we’re not even in the same ballpark with the pricing in the former IRP.”
Bielarski said the utility sold over 5,000 megawatts to Seminole in April for $55 a megawatt.
In response to a question from Director Jack Jacobs about how rising oil costs affect the utility’s costs, Bielarski said that biomass fuel is delivered by diesel trucks, while natural gas comes through a pipeline. He said the utility constantly shifts back and forth between generating plants, depending on which one is more economic at any time. For example, they can use coal or more biomass if natural gas prices go too high: “We have all these levers that we can pull, because we have the diversity [of fuels].”
In addition, Bielarski said, GRU has been able to buy solar power “on the cheap” because FP&L “overbuilt solar plants all around us… It’s always better to use somebody else’s money.”
Director Chip Skinner asked Bielarski for a spreadsheet that would allow the Authority to see how staff is planning for the future and making trade-offs between maintenance, improvements, and new plants. Bielarski said the energy supply group already has that, and he said he would share it with the board at a future meeting. Bielarski also said they would do an IRP in “another couple years.”
Director David Haslam said he is a “huge fan of keeping machines running,… rather than throwing [things] away.” He also said he thought the data center demand would peak at some point, so they could “bide our time until then… instead of paying triple for a RICE engine… All this stuff can be retrofitted, fixed, updated,… a lot of times on a huge savings… Building another billion-dollar power plant isn’t a great idea right now.”
Budget preview
In a budget presentation, Bielarski recommended no base rate increases for electricity or gas, for the third consecutive year; assuming the Authority approves the recommendations at their June meeting, water rates will increase 2%, and wastewater will increase 1.75%.
Bielarski said he is focusing on reducing O&M expenses, and interest expense has dropped by $10.6 million per year since FY24. He also presented a slide showing the heat rate and cost per megawatt-hour for each of GRU’s plants.
GRU will also continue to pay down debt and has paid down $123 million more than planned since 2023.
Moving stormwater and solid waste fees to property tax bills
The board was asked to approve an agreement that had been negotiated between the City of Gainesville and GRU, increasing the reimbursement from the City to GRU from $821,000 to an estimated $979,000. The City Commission has an upcoming agenda item on May 21 to consider ordinances that would allow them to place these fees on the annual property tax bills instead of billing them monthly through GRU.
During a lengthy discussion, Jacobs and Haslam argued that removing the fees from GRU customers’ bills would improve customers’ perceptions of GRU because those fees would not inflate bills. Chair Eric Lawson and Skinner argued that the utility would lose about a million dollars in revenue without reducing costs. Lawson also argued that HB 1645 prohibits Directors from making decisions on any basis other than “appropriate pecuniary factors and utility industry best practices [that] solely further the fiscal and financial benefit of the utility system and customers.”
Because the board was divided 2-2, any motion would fail, so the board took public comment and did not act on the agenda item.
Gainesville Interim City Manager Andrew Persons sent the following statement: “For some time, the city has been working with Gainesville Regional Utilities CEO Ed Bielarski to draft a new agreement for stormwater and solid waste billing that would continue the practice of placing those charges on customers’ utility bills. That system is outlined in a 2023 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between GRU and the City of Gainesville. Although the MOU was intended to remain in place until a new agreement was signed or either side opted to end the arrangement with 24 months’ notice, yesterday’s GRU Authority Board discussion appeared to indicate there is not support for continuation. Because of this uncertainty, the city is taking necessary steps to shift the solid waste and stormwater charges to an assessment that would appear on the tax bills of property owners.”




So, Eric Lawson’s statement reads to me that GRU profits a million dollars a year from the stormwater, and solid waste fees. Seem that way to you?
GRU collects a 4.5% fee for the service of billing those fees. The tax collector would collect a 2% fee.
Just for transparency, GRU brought an agreement to the for 4.5%, which the Board was unable to gain consensus on a vote.
The Alachua County Tax assessor is offering an agreement for 2% of revenues PLUS the City must pay for discounts on early payments (estimated by Mr Powers at another 3.5%) PLUS the city will not be about to bill non profits and governments for stormwater, estimated to be another $2.5 million.
“Bielarski said that both the Kelly and Deerhaven 2 investments had paid off within three years, and the dual-fuel conversion avoided a million tons of CO2 emissions.”
Mr. Birkarski, can you please provide a link to the mathematics supporting your claim that we “avoided a million tons of CO2 emissions ”? I bet the math is quite profound.
You do know that C02 emissions are necessary for plants to grow and plants make the oxygen we breathe through photosynthesis..
There is also no mandate from the state or federal governments that we reduce CO2 emissions…
Are you trying to comply with United Nations Agenda with CO2 regulations like how Hanrahan ruined GRU going biomass to comply with Kyoto protocol which ruined GRU and put us $1 billion in debt
and hence we now have the utility authority?
That zero waste by 2050 is UN hogwash too and unattainable…are you going to comply with that or use best management practices and run the utility without foreign politics? I bet China 🇨🇳 ain’t doing anything to stop climate change…
Do you believe in the tenets of the great reset and want to stop climate change?
These nonutility fees stay on the GRU bills in the City under the current SLA- a flat fee generating less for GRU with no incentive for actually properly billing all eligible GRU electric meters. In the past, the City has paid consultants large fees to find and backbill meters that were not billed at all. These fees are avoided through master electric meters, or by not having a GRU electric meter at all. GRU bills its electric meters- not parcels. Stormwater fees are based on mere estimates which frequently are questionable. GRU does not verify City stormwater fees.
This was unclear and hard to follow
https://www.mainstreetdailynews.com/govt-politics/gru-authority-gainesville-garbage-bills?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=gnvs_garbage_bills_charcuterie_comes_to_alachua_county&utm_term=2026-05-14
Another write up.
Haslem and Jacobs giving away $1 million over hurt feelings, ill suited for Board membership.
Because it’s Alachua County doesn’t Tallahassee get to change the rules and make whatever decision they want?
Hurt feelings? It saves everyone money. Look what the profit actual is it’s not a million dollars that is a top line number and unlike the tax collectors GRU would have losses over this. This isn’t political unless you want it to be. No one knows the inner workings of my mind or anyone one’s mine for that matter. You folks hating us is like drinking poison and hoping we get sick. If you like to speak with me at least your real name and reach out to me don’t do it anonymously on the internet.
For lower income customers who are struggling to pay their utility bills, it might be better to keep the fees on the utility bills and have a higher utility bill. If the fees are transferred to the property tax bills, landlords will increase rent (again). There are more programs available to help lower income customers with their utility bills and fewer programs to assist with paying rent. Additionally, GRU offers LEEP.
Great point!
“Bielarski said that when GRU eventually moves to digital billing, the bills for utility services and City fees could be separated.”
What is digital billing? Will GRU be going paperless? I like a paper bill.
Also, can the authority do something about the monthly garbage 🗑️ fee?
That cost seems to be too high…
How much does the city receive for the recyclables of aluminum, glass, plastic, & paper…all those are all commodities that can be sold at market prices and then can be applied to our utility bill to lower our bills…I have never received a clear answer on how much money the city receives from recycling of our trash.
Should the city create jobs again by getting back into the garbage business and having its own trucks and doing the recycling and the emptying of the cans? Maybe some of the biomass like paper can go in that biomass plant…plastic can also be used as fuel. Through pyrolysis of plastic, 2lbs of plastic = 1 quart of oil.
Recycling doesn’t make as much money as you think it is typically ran at a loss at worst and break even at best. Being recyclable isn’t the same as there being market for the material. Cardboard, aluminum, steel, typically make money but transporting and sorting costs could wipe out that profit quickly. Plastics typically lose money as new plastic is far cheaper and cleaner. A few colored bottles can ruin a batch of clear bottles making everything Grey. Areas that mandate a set percentage of post consumer plastic be used help create the demand for recycled plastic. Florida is not one of those places. This is why many of the surrounding counties have discontinued recycling glass and plastic as they can’t keep operating at a loss with the economy the way it is.
No. I don’t but your argument…Aluminum brings$1.69/lb, paper and plastic can be used as fuel.. the question has not been answered..
When I toured the recycling center at the Leveda Brown Environmental Park, my understanding is that the facility is a almost a break-even proposition, perhaps generating a slight profit.
The operation makes money off metals and paper/cardboard, and lose money on everything else. They recycle plastic when possible, but ultimately can’t create demand where it doesn’t exist. I don’t know how that works out between the City and County, as the County operates the center.
More information on a paper bill than on line. Digital bill is minimal information.
Also not everyone has access to a phone, computer, etc. Every user has an address.
@Mary: Exactly. Some customers can’t afford internet. Some older customers don’t have a computer, email, or internet; nor do they know how to use these things. Digital bills won’t work for everyone.