GRU Authority hears updates on lawsuits, responds to public comments
BY JENNIFER CABRERA
GAINESVILLE, Fla. – At the July 9 GRU Authority meeting, the board heard updates on GRU operations and the status of several lawsuits; CEO Ed Bielarski also responded to criticisms raised during public comment.
Responses to public comments
In response to a public comment from Chuck Ross about the IRP (Integrated Resource Plan) not being finished and three plants nearing the end of their service life, GRU CEO Ed Bielarski said, “I’ll just reiterate that the IRP was finished. It’s a document that’s out there, and we’re following it. We’re working towards the real-life actions that are necessary to follow the plan. The IRP is a plan… The idea that 110 megawatts will just miraculously come offline just isn’t the case… [Our staff keeps] these units running efficiently and effectively… These plants have almost been replaced from top to finish… They’re man’s creation, and they can be renewed through man’s innovation, and that’s what we’re doing.”
In response to a public comment from Jim Konish alleging financial irregularities (see his letter to the editor here), Director Jack Jacobs said, “All our books and everything are looked at by many eyes, including auditors and persons – SEC, banks, investors… I get it, you don’t like the way that some of the accounting is done, or you don’t think it’s done the way you would do it, but it is what it is right now. That’s the way the books are done. If you… think there’s some law being broken, then… take that to the appropriate law enforcement agency.”
Responding to Ross’s comment about spending money on lawsuits, Jacobs said, “If this was still under the City Commission, they’d still be taking millions of dollars,… and when something breaks, then the whole system would implode. Now we’re in a safe place, as reflected by our bond ratings and liquidity, where we can handle contingencies that come up.”
CEO comments
Bielarski announced that Moody’s affirmed a stable outlook for GRU and added, “They said there’s several ways in which we could be downgraded, and they all relate, really, to the debt,… and the one I want to note is, it also said that what can lead to a downgrade is more aggressive demands for transfers to the City’s General Fund. I mean, that’s part of what the new referendum that was voted upon by the City Commission explicitly does: it says that they will take the cap off the General Fund Transfer, the current limitation. So that’s in direct violation of what Moody’s is saying would lead to a downgrade… Fitch [also said] they liked the plan that the board is bringing to the table.”
Responding to Konish’s comment about GRU’s disconnection rates, Bielarski showed a chart with disconnection rates for other municipal utilities; he said JEA and Tallahassee did not respond with their data in time to be included. GRU’s disconnection rate of 2.3% this year is the same as Orlando’s and falls between Lakeland, at 1.19%, and Kissimmee, at 2.8%.
Bielarski said GRU had 3,166 disconnects in June but 2,800 reconnects, and some of those people may have moved out and “left bills behind, [leaving GRU] with bad debt that everyone else has to pay. So we’re doing the proper thing. We’re doing it within best practices.”
Bielarski said the new Chief Customer Officer is looking at a list of customers who have a high ratio of energy usage to square footage, and someone is “actually driving out to different houses” to see how GRU can help with their energy usage.
GRU Review
During the GRU Review agenda item, Bielarski said the vacancy rate for staff positions at GRU has dropped from 13% in May 2022 to about 8% in May 2025; in between, the rates dropped near 8% but went up to 11% in August 2024 before coming back down. Bielarski said the organization is “seeing the fruits of bringing over an HR department that’s focused solely on our organization.”
Bielarski said that despite filling the vacancies, GRU is still under budget because the number of positions was reduced from about 940 in May 2022 to 879 in late 2024; some of those positions were meter readers, who are no longer needed with the new AMI meters.
$11 million award to Jacob Rodgers
Bielarski addressed the legislature’s award of $11 million to Jacob Rodgers, who was T-boned by a GRU employee and partially paralyzed; he said GRU has already paid the settlement out of electric fund reserves and said that could “be a consideration as we go through the rest of the year, to see where those monies fall out and what we have to do as a mitigating circumstance for that.”
Bielarski said the Kelly plant had “a rough June,” with several outages, but the issues are solved, and “next week, we’re going to be heading into some clear sailing with Kelly.”
Bielarski said the LEEP program has hit a milestone of spending $10 million to retrofit 2,500 homes to make them more energy-efficient.
Status of lawsuits
Regarding pending lawsuits, Bielarski said GRU is appealing Judge George Wright’s decision in their lawsuit about the City’s 2024 ballot referendum; the City made a motion to expedite the appeal, and GRU is opposed to that. GRU also filed an emergency motion to stay Judge Wright’s order, and the City has filed a response opposing that motion.
The Petition for Writ of Quo Warranto filed by Jason Fults and Bobby Mermer was voluntarily dismissed in early July, and GRU will be filing a lawsuit soon (authorized at the July 11 meeting) to challenge the City’s 2025 ballot referendum. Bielarski concluded, “We’re doing this because House Bill 1645 is the law – it’s the law – and it was voted upon by elected officials at the state legislature and signed by the Governor. And we’re here until told otherwise to protect House Bill 1645, and,… as the rating agencies have shown, as the bills have shown, and our performance is showing, this is a good thing for the community, our customers, and everyone involved. So we’re going to continue to fight.”

Director Jacobs: “[The] City Commission… [has] no plan for a budget. Their plan is to take back GRU and raid the piggy bank.”
Jacobs said it was “disappointing to see the latest City Commission meeting because they have no plan for a budget. Their plan is to take back GRU and raid the piggy bank. They utterly had no solutions on how to budget for anything other than raiding the piggy bank again.”
Bielarski said, “Let’s face it: GRU is paying the City less money, but it’s not like they have less money. They’ve made it up with property taxes and very, very little expenditure cuts.”
Authority Attorney Kiersten Ballou said, “The appeal of Judge Wright’s order for the 1st DCA, that’s really our substantive issue… We really think on Count I, the law is on our side, and we’d like for the 1st DCA to take a look at that specific issue.” Count I held that the City’s ballot referendum was inconsistent with the statute that created the Authority; Judge Wright ruled in favor of the City on that count.
Attorney Ballou on expediting the appeal of Judge Wright’s order: “You can do it right or you can do it fast, but you can’t have both… This is really a problem of the City’s own creation, and an emergency created by them is not an emergency for us.”
Ballou said the City wanted to expedite the appeal because they have scheduled another referendum for November 2025, “and our argument is, essentially, you can do it right or you can do it fast, but you can’t have both, and we prefer to do it correctly and allow the 1st DCA to really look into these issues so that we’re not constantly in a state of flux and everyone’s arguing forevermore.” She said the Authority’s response to the City’s motion to expedite the appeal argued that “this is really a problem of the City’s own creation, and an emergency created by them is not an emergency for us.”
Regarding the motion for a stay before Judge Wright, Ballou said, “When we filed our Notice of Appeal on June 4, our position is, under the rules, we are granted an automatic stay. Essentially, what that means is, there’s a provision in the appellate rules that say if a governmental agency appeals a decision of a court, there’s an automatic stay that is in place until the appeal is resolved.” She said the stay would prohibit the City from moving forward with the November 2025 ballot referendum.
Ballou said that in the Fults/Mermer case, GRU argued that because the City already litigated the same issue on behalf of its citizens, individuals cannot re-litigate it. She said the plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed the lawsuit after receiving the case law sent by GRU.
Free energy audits
During Director Comments, Director Chip Skinner encouraged people to get free energy audits from GRU if they think their bills are too high; he said low-income customers can apply to get new energy-efficient air conditioners and water heaters through the LEEP program.



“Bielarski said the new Chief Customer Officer is looking at a list of customers who have a high ratio of energy usage to square footage”
It used to be students + high ratio of energy usage to square footage = pot plant grow lights.
That was before solar panels and LED’s
Any aspect of decorum has left with Craig Carter. This commission is a joke. Not saying the city was better. What I’m saying is that we, the people, when from one group of idiots to another.
Doesn’t look good… Haslam mocking people’s objection to them adding Hexafluorosilicic acid in the water supply and Jacobs not responding to Konish’s legitimate accounting questions (while flippantly telling him to call law enforcement). The city was much worse…but dear God!!!
I don’t get why GRU has to fight lawfare. The state made them, Gainesville should battle it out with the state, that passed the new law.
The local ACLUSPLCDNC want to downgrade GRU’s credit rating with lawsuits and city politics, keeping costs higher than should be still. So it’ll hurt poor ratepayers and generate crime even more. 👹👺👿🤡💩
The City and people like Jason Fults, who makes his living sucking funds out of the City and GRU for his Community Weatherization Coalition, will never have enough money without their cash cow to waste on their pet projects like another $590,000 for trash cans, no less come up with the $85.5 Million to renovate Citizens Field.
For proof of my assertions regarding ongoing GRU financial irregularities, go to whypaygrumore.com. FDLE has boxes of GRU Internal documents showing a willful refusal to identify GRU SLA losses and include them in the Flow of funds and Financial Statements as authority members have sworn to do. Ignorance is no excuse. The GRU CFO has been questioned in Tallahassee regarding these and other matters. The ongoing bundling of stormwater and garbage charges with electric charges, and other regressive policies are fueling the disconnections. This problem is with the GRU Authority, NOT our buildings.
The only SLA loss since the Authority took over has been the Information Technology SLA, which was executed during the first Authority board for one year at $3 million less than our estimated cost of ~$5 million. The amount was included in the Flow of Funds and identified not in the report but in public. We are collecting the ~ $5 million for the current year. All other SLA’s, MOU’s are being handled on a “no loss” basis as I brought forth in one of my previous CEO comments. By definition, anything executed previous to the Authority isn’t an SLA (e/g. solar feed in tariffs, etc.). There aren’t these huge SLA losses Jim.
Sec. 7.02 of the City Charter provides:
“”Service Level Agreement” or “SLA” means a contract entered into by the Authority that establishes a set of deliverables that one party has agreed to provide another”. I agree with Ed that the solar feed-in tariff losses are not “SLA” losses – by definition. However, there are other tools available to the Authority to rectify this outrage.
The following partial list of GRU SLA losses are unidentified, not included in the Flow of Funds and are not noted in the 2024 GRU Financial Statements; as required by HB1645:
1. Collection and administration of many millions of pyramided dollars of City and County utility taxes and local option sales taxes WITHOUT CHARGE. GRU will lose approximately $1 million when it stops bundling City nonutility stormwater and garbage fees into the GRU electric bill. Bielarksi was told to “make up” this revenue drop by Lawson, but failed to do so. I routinely find these taxes imposed on exempt GRU customers and obtain refunds going back three (3) years. GRU could easily find these billing errors without me but does not have the staff or incentive to do this.
2. Provision of service to County fire hydrants WITHOUT CHARGE.
3. Provision and servicing of County rental streetlight poles and fixtures in 2024 without billing the County at all, and without obtaining ANY FY24 payment from the City as agreed. This expense was belatedly deducted from the Direct Transfer to the City in FY25.
4. Provision of GRUCom internet services to the City, County, and school board (the primary customers) below cost (GRUCom loses $1 million on revenues of $4 million).
5. Low Income Energy Assistance Program (LEAP)
For more details, see my attached Alachua Chronicle post of November 17, 2024, titled, “SLAs Hide Transfers of GRU Ratepayer Money to the City”.
The HB1645 focus on reporting of SLA losses flowed from Finding 3 of the 2022 State Auditor General’s Report finding systematic falsification of Full Cost Allocation Reports (FCAPs, which can be criminal) that determine the flow of funds through an interfund exchange between GRU and the City SLA losses apply to in kind as opposed to the financial (Direct) transfers. Financial Statements are based only on financial transactions.
GRU’s massive bond debt is secured largely by a pledge of future REVENUES, not physical assets. If there are excessive or concealed misappropriation of GRU resources, either direct or in kind, this becomes a breach of bond covenants. That undermines the bondholder’s collateral.
Due to GRU deteriorated financial condition, HB1645 codified the bond covenants into the City Charter to prevent a technical bond collateral default. Authority Members, including former member Bielarski swore to abide by all of HB1645 – but have failed to do so.
Jennifer and I forgot to mention that there were NO ACTION ITEMS whatsoever on the monthly agenda.
“Authority” members are little more than lap puppies of Belarski and Lawson. Moreover, the current membership of the Authority fails to meet the statutory qualification. As such, the Authority as currently constituted is legally defective. For details, I will post an analysis on whypayGRUmore.com this afternoon.
I will also soon post a GRU video of George Swinford seated in his recliner lauding the new A/C GRU furnished him WITHOUT CHARGE! This is another unreported SLA loss, AND it is a violation of the Art. 7.12 Prohibition on policies based on “social, political, or ideological interests”. This program furthers neither the “financial health” of GRU nor the “pecuniary interests” of GRU Ratepayers generally.
Claiming to have expended $10 million dollars to upgrade 2500 homes, GRU currently has referred $9,864,849.80 to collections (year to date).
You might want to check out the Florida Energy Efficiency and Conservation Act
The LEEP should of been handed off to the City Commission, and you know it.