Jury acquits Gainesville woman of pre-meditated murder of boyfriend
Staff report
GAINESVILLE, Fla. – Rachael Laniese Wilks, 32, was acquitted by a jury last week after she spent over two years in jail on a charge of first-degree premeditated murder of her boyfriend. She was reportedly pregnant with twins at the time of her arrest in February 2022.
The incident
Wilks had called the non-emergency dispatch line at 9:00 p.m. on December 31, 2021, and asked to speak to an officer about removing someone from her residence. She reportedly refused to provide the address or give details. An officer told her she would need to evict the person because he had established residence there, and her search history about an hour later reportedly showed her searching for “eviction cost gainesville fl.”
At about 11:45 p.m. on December 31, Wilks called 911 while driving to her parents’ house to drop off her children. She told dispatchers that she had “discharged her weapon in self-defense” after her boyfriend had repeatedly attacked her. She said she did not know if her boyfriend was injured and asked for emergency medical services to check on him.
Upon arrival, Gainesville Police Department officers found the victim, Brian Rashad Brown, deceased and face down in a pool of blood, with a single gunshot wound to the right temple. He was lying on top of his phone.
Post Miranda, Wilks reportedly initially stated that she and the victim had been in an ongoing verbal and physical altercation since the previous night (December 30). She described a long history of domestic violence in which her boyfriend repeatedly struck her and threatened her life. She said she had taken her gun from her purse after being shoved into closet doors and then pinned down on the bed. She told officers that she told the victim she would call the police if he didn’t leave the house. He refused to leave, and, according to Wilks, said he would kill her and her unborn children before police could arrive. She said she charged across the room at the victim, closed her eyes, and fired the gun at him. She said she fled the room without looking back and left the house with her children.
Officers reported that Wilks did not have any injuries consistent with her account of physical abuse, and there was no history of calls regarding domestic violence between the two.
The report notes that forensic evidence at the scene was inconsistent with Wilks’ story, including blood spatter and the location of the wound. There was a downward angle from the entrance wound to where the bullet was located at the base of the skull, which was not consistent with her story that the victim was standing and moving toward her. The angle is consistent with the victim kneeling or being below Wilks when he was shot.
In a second post-Miranda interview on February 1, 2022, Wilks reportedly changed her story multiple times from the first interview. For example, she told officers that when the victim saw her gun, he knelt down to pick up his phone, with his back to her. She said he began to turn toward her and said he would kill her, and then she shot him and fled the house. She admitted to being frustrated that the victim would not leave the house. However, she also denied knowing she had shot the victim and said she didn’t know why the forensic evidence did not match her story. She was arrested on February 1, 2022.
The verdict
The jury was instructed to consider whether the evidence showed beyond a reasonable doubt that Wilks committed first degree murder, second degree murder, or manslaughter. The jury instructions contained definitions of all of those crimes, along with definitions of justifiable homicide and excusable homicide, and the instructions noted that Wilks “had no duty to retreat before using deadly force” if she “reasonably believed that such force was necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to herself or another.”
The jury was also instructed that in considering the issue of self-defense, “you may take into account the relative physical capabilities of Rachael Laniese Wilks and Brian Rashad Brown.” The instructions stated that the jury should consider whether statements made outside of court (like Wilks’ post-Miranda statements) were “freely and voluntarily made.”
The jury had the option to find Wilks guilty of first-degree murder, second-degree murder, or manslaughter, and the unanimous verdict was “Not guilty.” Wilks has been released on her own recognizance.
Evidence doesn’t matter when you’re a “battered woman” with no evidence of being battered. Note taken.
Hope you know!
It doesn’t matter if you can see mark doesn’t mean there are now.
So true
well 2 years wasted i guess
Good. Sounds like it was self defense. I am glad the jury did not convict her. She has a lot of healing to do. She is in my prayers along with the children being around domestic violence.
Amen—been there & still have the t- shirt. My own father threatened my mother & me, when he was drinking. Then I married somebody, who didn’t drink, but was mean as the devil himself to me & my child. I was the only wage earner—a teacher with a Masters’ degree. It happens in all races & socio-economic incomes.
Did you kill them?
As a result , did you put a gun to their head facing downward, then fire a shot and claim that he was running towards you to attack ? Oh, ok
Yep “self defense” with a perfect kill shot to the temple but he was coming towards her? And enjoyed cake and ice cream while all this was happening she was “so afraid” KARMA IS REAL AND SHE WILL NEED ALL YOUR PRAYERS
Unfortunately if they are released back into her custody, they will still be around domestic violence as she was the aggressor in the past, and tried to play victim, calling the police and it resulted in her being arrested as the attacker. Look into her record.
We’d have to see the entire courtroom testimony and evidence to determine if the jury was in error. Was the victim really abusive to her, or told others he was upset with the violently suspect for any reason? Hopefully the detectives and public lawyers investigated that.
Regardless, this is why society sets standards. Work and a stable marriage should come *before* offspring, not after (if ever).
Was the home govt-subsidizing an unmarried couple? Govt should not permit that, it prolongs the poverty cycle.
The Victim (Brian Brown) has a history of domestic battery, and issues with beating women. Maybe in this case Brown hit Wilks one to many times prior too this incident and she said enough. I’m sure the court minutes are or will be public record. The jury of her peers acquitted her and this may very well be a case of self defense. Anyway she spent two tears in jail waiting for her day in court. She got it and she is now free. Far to many women put up with and endure domestic violence. This time Wilks put an end to it.
An end to it while he was incoherent and not exactly attacking her. Let’s consider that to be murder. Rachael knows it, and it will catch up with her one day for sure. All I want you to do is save this comment for the day that she strikes (literally) again!
All I’m saying us that a jury acquitted her and I’m trying to offer possible in-sight on what the jury determined. Also Brown was a women beater and abuser. His history clearly shows that. If you are going to get upset blame the state attorney for not presenting their case good enough to convict. She cant be retried since she was acquitted.
Did you see her history?! She was abusive and a liar as well and never appeared to be afraid of brown until after she killed him… Your right the state attorney did a half a** job to let the poor “innocent” female walk free
What’s the problem?
The jury said, “Not guilty.”
The guy did this to himself because sometimes people fight back.
She did everyone a favor. It would have been just a matter of time before his violence exploded on an innocent victim.
Brian Rashad Brown got everything he was deserved.
Yep, he had the beater tactic down where he would use a pillow to smother and beat to lessen possible bruising.
You sound so ignorant and you clearly know nothing about the case she has a history of violence as well with her previous child’s father she is not the innocent one here
If you knew her in real life, you know she did it intentionally. She’s a horrible person and did it while her kids were in the next room. She should be under the jail house.
Thank you was a big bully and she met her match so she decided to kill him ! He didn’t want to harm his kids !!
If she were white, she would have been exonerated two years ago in a stand your ground hearing. The legal system here in America is biased against blacks.
Legal system isn’t, people are.
Face the facts though, there are a lot of black people who don’t do themselves any favors.
What BS. Ever hear of OJ Simpson, who clearly murdered two white people but our biased legal system let him go? What about ‘justice’ for the Black Man Brian Brown? There’s less evidence here for Brian being killed in self defense than the use of force against Michael Brown in Ferguson, but the crooked ‘legal system’…
Where’s your proof? Cite your sources. Not just one case but show me data backing your claim.
Um with you when your right
It’s troubling on this news site those who would apparently convict her simply because of the color of her skin.
A jury of her peers acquitted her of any crimes and some imply she’s still guilty.
Good thing justice in this case, was blind.
If not, she’ll answer to a far greater power than what’s here on Earth.
Is this surprising? The readers here also think Trump is innocent despite what the jury said.
Here you go, making this political. So, you support Banana Republics? If you do, you’re an enemy of the Constitution.
Who is making such statements? I don’t see a single one that fits the racial smear that you carelessly propose. Please clarify your accusation, otherwise we’re left to assume you believe racism exists everywhere, except in your own heart.
Just because it’s not on full display doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.
I know where naivete exists as well.
Based on the report, this is a bizarre case. One would have to see all the evidence to make a reasonable decision on it, but the jury is out and that’s all that matters. The local and angle of the shot is suspect to me.
Shooting someone in the side of their head doesn’t sound like self defence to me.
Could very well be this: In the US, the battered woman syndrome as a legal defense started to be developed in the 1970s. In 1977 in the US, Francine Hughes’ trial for the murder of her husband was one of the first cases involving what was later called battered-woman syndrome as a defense.[17][18]
A legal defense using BWS may argue that the systematic abuse suffered by the victim of domestic violence has led her to believe that killing the abuser was the only way to avoid being killed herself and may rely on self-defense or imperfect self defense. Alternatively, the victim may argue that the abuse has severely affected her mental state, in which case the insanity defense or diminished responsibility defense may be used. Provocation is another defense that may be used. A legal defense using BWS seeks to obtain an acquittal, a mitigated sentence or a conviction of a lesser offense.
She very well may need mental health treatment.
I am also with someone who went to prison for domestic violence however my spouse knows that I will put my hands back on them and I’ve already let him know. Point blank I gave you a new life it’s time to live it the way that you’re supposed to if you put your hands on me I’ll do any and every means necessary to protect myself it’s either me or him we have been together now for 8 years with no problems as far as him putting his hands on me and if that day ever comes to where it’s either my life or his I’m going to be the one to live.. point blank I don’t care what consequences are rendered I will stand up for my right to live. I’m glad she was able to be acquitted because the dude that she was with was horrible to her and her kids
How do you know? I mean I’d that were the case how did she end up with twins out of the whole ordeal? Could it be that she’s just as insecure as you have to be to have taken him back?
She did her time.
Long live BRIAN RASHAD BROWN people know the truth behind her lies and she was able to play victim had this been male on male crime life would have been the sentence. She got sympathy for being pregnant at the the time and being a woman got her off. One shot to the head is not self defense and if you were scared why didn’t you tell your mother to come to you with the police?! Instead you call his mother and a non emergency # and wouldn’t give your address ! And why would you let someone live with you after a month or two of knowing him anyways!! …..RACHAEL WILKS YOU KNOW YOU DID THIS INTENTIONALLY… I hope everyday you look at those kids(if they are his) it reminds you of all the lies you told and you will not live a free life regardless of being “not guilty”
Rachael is the type to throw rocks and hide her hands. I’m this particular case, she had an attorney to assist her in doing so. I’m not convinced that the jury was shown evidence that she was afraid for her life. What I do know, is that the phone call to the non emergency line as well as the fact that there was a perfect shot and she had no wounds at the time of his death…..leads me to believe he wasn’t posing a threat when he was murdered! This woman went and ate cake and ice cream, and also refused to give her address after claiming to be in danger!! Sadly , who they allowed to walk away freely is a threat to society and also a psychopath who should’ve been admitted to an insane asylum! Karma is real and unless she checks into anger management, there will be another incident and the outcome will be much different. She has a past as well , I suggest everyone go research that as well. She is not innocent. She’s a lying, manipulative, victim playing , profession actress who is a menace to society and happened to get lucky. People like you make it hard for REAL VICTIMS!