Konish: City litigation strategy is flawed

Letter to the editor

In order to get a preliminary injunction to stymie Clemons’ bill, the City must show:

  1. Irreparable harm
  2. A strong likelihood of success on the merits

Neither is at play. GRU ratepayers will suffer irreparable harm if GRU does not dramatically change course, and our City Commission will not do it.

The supremacy of the legislature’s powers over the City of Gainesville is beyond serious doubt.

If the City sues, they will have to engage with the State of Florida:

Advertisement
  1. House of Representatives
  2. Senate
  3. Governor and
  4. Attorney General

The Governor can easily stop a lawsuit by removing and replacing belligerent City Commission members.

Courts are wary of utility disputes due to the complexity, wide-ranging impacts, and huge sums of money at stake.

At no point thus far has our City Commission recognized any problem with our current political GRU governance structure.

GRU’s balance sheet and operational woes, debt downgrades, and out-of-control General Fund Transfers, coupled with concomitant excessive City spending, all pose real threats to the GRU revenue stream that has been pledged to secure the massive GRU bond debt.

It is difficult to imagine why GRU bondholders would side with our current City Commission in any litigation. They certainly would be interested parties.

There is little to no chance that a long-shot lawsuit could benefit either the City or GRU ratepayers. Bondholders could call their bonds, and the City of Gainesville would “tumble.”

GRU ratepayers would not be well served by a partisan and futile custody battle over GRU with the State of Florida.

Jim Konish, Gainesville

The opinions expressed by letter or opinion writers are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of AlachuaChronicle.com. Letters may be submitted to info@alachuachronicle.com and are published at the discretion of the editor.

15 Comments