Perry expresses concern about GHS teacher who posted intent to discriminate against maskless students

That guy needs to be removed from that school immediately. Go look at his FB page, ridiculous! He’s a radical Marxist that has no business having this level of influence on young minds!

Would be very interesting if a maskless student who has an accomodation in place due to something like ADHD or something else bc of a medical condition and they must be seated at the front of the classroom in order for them to succeed. Now they’d have a discrimination complaint for violating ADA!!

What is wrong with the people in positions of power in Gainesville? The School Board must be having to make decisions with increased carboxyhemoglobin levels from inhaling carbon dioxide trapped in the masks. The Gainesville City Commissioners taking great pride in wasting taxpayer dollars to sue Governor DeSantis and refusing to listen to their own city attorney, just like they refused to accept study reports on issues that disagreed with their “desired” outcome. One of their fellow commissioners, an attorney, expressed great reservations about their desired complaint bc it was of political issues instead of legal issues, wording that simply hoisted their concerns to highly politicized mud slinging affair, and very little legal or cohesive reasoning that might actually result in consideration of their desired outcome by the court. Their own city attorney, the person who is to represent the city, unless facing action against the city attorney’s as part of the same legal action, advised against the lawsuit and told them that the argument needed to be written based on legal reasoning, not on political stances that would most likely result in summary judgement early on and be an expensive slap in the face to the city and, more importantly, the taxpayers who are footing the bill. The GCC turns around and adds further insult to injury and directs the city attorney to contact different law firms who might be interested in representing the city and have them appear at a GCC meeting with a presentation of how they’d work the case, would they be willing to draft the complaint per their instructions, and proposed budget. Basically, the meeting would be an interview. Other firms were upset at being excluded and not allow to present or even offer a proposal!! So many legal issues there: no request for proposal for the job, no pre-screening (firms could be handpicked by the city attorney without any clear criterion), no cap on legal.fees, no criterion for the complaint, etc. Furthermore, absent any type of possible conflict for the city attorney or her office, the actions could be deemed illegal as the city charter clearly grants the city attorney the responsibility of representing the city (disagreeing with the GCC, I’m surprised they haven’t fired or requested the resignation of the city attorney already!). Add in the fact that city has not been harmed by the law and may lack standing as an injured party, this could become even more expensive if a judge decides the city has filed a frivolous lawsuit and could be made to pay the legal fees for the governor and the state! I certainly hope that the State AG looks into that possibility soon and is ready to seek immediate dismissal with prejudice and request legal fees from the GCC so that it will send a clear message that frivolous that are filed based upon political mud slinging, instead of exceptional legal reasoning, will be met with swift and harsh counteraction and that they will seek legal remedies to the frivolity including dismissal with predhudice (they can’t refile the case in the future, unless the circumstances change such as being harmed by the law), ordering payment of the legal fees to quash the complaint, bashing the frivolity due to political rhetoric in the appropriate arena for these things: the media, and any other remedies for which they may be eligible under the law. These elected people who crave media attention by using the court system for political attacks instead of it’s proper use for righting wrongs by using proper legal reasoning should face charges of contempt of court for wasting the time of the court system, the judges, and the taxpayer money recklessly if they engage in this type of lunacy and abuse repeatedly. Those government officials who vote against said action bc of concerns over the proposed complaint(s), such as GCC Commissioner Saco, would be exempt from action if they tried to stop moving forward as evidenced by their vote (regardless of their reason to vote against)! The courts are already backed up enough and the message needs to be sent that the courts are not to be misused for sending political messages!!