Repeat felon sentenced to two years in prison for firearm offense

Staff report

GAINESVILLE, Fla. – Robert Anthony Yancy, Jr., 25, has been sentenced to two years in federal prison for possessing a firearm as a convicted felon. The sentence was announced by John P. Heekin, United States Attorney for the Northern District of Florida.

U.S. Attorney Heekin said, “The safety of our communities is not negotiable, and we will not yield control of our streets to serial felons, like this defendant, who have amply demonstrated their outright refusal to follow the law. My office will aggressively prosecute these cases to deliver the safe, crime-free streets our citizens deserve.”

Original arrest

Advertisement

Yancy was arrested on January 2, 2026, after a traffic stop for non-working taillights and tag lights. An Alachua County Sheriff’s Deputy reported smelling marijuana and then reported that marijuana “shake” was in plain view on the center console. A probable cause search of the vehicle reportedly produced a handgun in a bag behind the passenger seat; Yancy reportedly made spontaneous statements indicating that he knew he was a felon and shouldn’t have had the firearm, but he was in the process of moving to a new apartment.

Upon his release, Yancy will be subject to three years’ supervised release. 

The case involved a joint investigation by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, and the Alachua County Sheriff’s Office. Assistant United States Attorney Adam Hapner prosecuted the case.

Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN) is the Department of Justice’s nationwide initiative that brings federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement, prosecutors, and other public safety partners together to coordinate efforts to combat violent crime and make communities safe. Coordinated by U.S. Attorneys’ offices in each of the 94 federal districts, PSN is tailored to particular communities to strategically address specific violent crime and public safety challenges. As a key component of Operation Take Back America, PSN serves a central role in the Department’s commitment to make our country safe. PSN emphasizes three core principles: rapid federal response to violent crime and criminal offenders; strong, strategic partnerships among law enforcement at all levels; and accountability and deterrence through the prosecution of the most serious, readily provable offenses and other strategies. These efforts complement and strengthen President Trump’s Homeland Security Task Forces, ensuring a comprehensive federal response to the most pressing public safety issues facing communities.

  • Hey AC: two years for a repeat, “serial felon” for a gun charge. Two years. Two. Hmmm…

    Idea: why not begin EVERY article about a convicted criminal with a prominent call-out box containing four things:

    THE CRIMINAL. THE CRIME. THE JUDGE. THE SENTENCE. A cute little box in any article about an adjudicated criminal.

    Yes, I know, “all of that information is already in the story.” I’m suggesting pulling it out, put it in a box, and make it impossible to miss—particularly the name of the judge who imposed the sentence.

    Think of it as the local-crime version of the Iran hostage crisis ticker on the nightly news: the running count the networks kept prominently on screen during news coverage so viewers never lost sight of how US citizens were being held hostage. The point was to keep it top of mind. Same idea here.

    And I feel like the judges deserve to be showcased—or, let’s use the word “highlighted.” So let’s “celebrate” them by actually keeping track of their sentencing records over time.

    Basically, baseball cards for judges. Keeping track of their their… stats.

    Once a month, publish a cumulative scorecard story showing each judge’s record and sorting them from most lenient, to least.

    And here’s where it gets interesting: nobody wants to be sitting at the top of the “Most Lenient Judge” leaderboard in a monthly news article…

    If every crime story prominently identifies the criminal, the judge, the sentence, and those decisions accumulate into a publicly visible “scorecard,” individual sentencing decisions stop disappearing into yesterday’s news.

    Judges would know that their records are being consistently measured, and showcased, and that readers can see the patterns for themselves. Maybe they won’t care. I’ll bet their neighbors, their barber, the membership committee at their country club will care… Sunshine!

    No editorializing. No need to point out the obvious. Just show the numbers and put the judge’s name(s) next to them. Call it sunlight through statistics.

  • >