School Board of Alachua County asks the State Board of Education to overturn approval of Newberry charter school

The School Board of Alachua County voted to appeal the charter school approval on March 12

BY JENNIFER CABRERA

GAINESVILLE, Fla. – Attorneys retained by the School Board of Alachua County have formally appealed the approval of a conversion charter school in Newberry.

The letter is signed by attorneys Terry Harmon, Amy Envall, and Molly Shaddock from Sniffen and Spellman, P.A., a firm hired on November 26, 2024, to represent the district “related to General Education and other matters from time to time” through June 30, 2025. The firm’s attorneys are paid $200 per hour, with a maximum total billing of $25,000.

The letter lays out arguments that have become familiar to both supporters and opponents of the effort by a group of parents, supported by the City of Newberry, to convert Newberry Elementary School into a charter school.

The vote failed

The letter argues that the vote to convert the school failed because “Prior to the vote, both parties… agreed to conduct the vote in accordance with [Florida statutes] and [the rule governing conversion charter votes].” After the teachers voted 22-22 and the district announced that the vote failed under the rule that required (at the time) a majority of votes, the attorneys wrote, “the Applicant never challenged or appealed the voting results.” The letter states in a footnote that the Applicant sought “some sort of clarification” from the Department of Education and received a response stating that “if… at least half of the teachers voted for conversion, then the applicant has met that threshold requirement.” The rule was later amended to align with the statute that specifies “at least 50%” of the teachers must vote in favor of the charter conversion.

The letter states that it “is undisputed that at the time of the vote there was a facial conflict between the Rule and [the Statute],” but “Both parties agreed to the requirement of ‘more than half’ – and it was under these requirements that the vote was advertised, conducted, and failed.”

Concerns with the application

The letter states that Alachua County Public Schools reviewed the charter school’s application, noted “at least ninety-two (92) concerns,” and recommended that the application be denied. The district found that five sections of the application met the standard, nine sections partially met the standard, and eight sections did not meet the standard. Conversely, the Florida Charter Institute (FCI) found that 21 sections met the standard and one section partially met the standard. FCI noted five concerns. The attorneys state that during the Applicant’s interview with FCI, the district’s concerns were brought up, but “they were only addressed superficially, without extensive details or getting into the specifics.”

“De facto municipal conversion charter application”

The attorneys argue that although the City of Newberry “is not the applicant in this case,” because of the City’s extensive involvement in the effort, “an argument can be made that it appears to be a de facto municipal conversion charter application, which is not permitted by law.”

Jurisdictional issues

Since the Florida Department of Education’s rule only gives the applicant the ability to appeal the decisions of the Charter School Review Commission, the attorneys admit that “Based on the plain language of the statutes and applicable rule, there is no express right for the District, as the sponsor, to appeal the approval” of the application but argue, “This is inherently unjust and unfair.”

Conclusion

The attorneys concluded by asking the State Board of Education to overturn the decision of the Charter School Review Commission or let the district “exercise the right to appeal the decision in the same manner in which the applicant is expressly afforded in the applicable rule and Florida Statutes.”

  • Anyone want to bet how the state will rule on this one? I know where my money will be…. 🙂

  • Let them have their school & see how it is without the county. Who knows how it will develop??????

  • SBAC can’t balance a budget or give teachers a raise but has money to pay attorneys for this.

    • Not to worry…SBAC accounted for this expense…by using the additional funds they fraudulently acquired from state/feds last year by exaggerating enrollment numbers.🤡

  • The article might as well say that considerable taxpayer money was used to argue that the sun not rise tomorrow. Talk about a (struggling for polite words) dumba… case.

    • This is looking more and more like the welfare mom who keeps having kids to fund her bad habits. It’s not about seeing to the children’s needs, it’s all about the harmful addictions; reassigning poorly performing personnel to the District Offices just because they’re friends of Certain board members, creating positions because of personal agendas, and let’s not forget overpaying for a Superintendent to replace the Superintendent who was just given a raise.

  • Quit wasting taxpayer dollars on lawyers and pay the teachers,and start rezoning those underenrolled schools on the Eastside of town,and sell the properties.Its time to DOGE SBAC.

  • Good.

    As I previously noted, the easy part was getting the charter school “approved”, which happened on a 50-50 vote. That is not an indicator of the positive energy which will be needed in abundance for the hard part of creating and running the school. To have a written “rule” or “statute” which says approval requires 50% approval by vote is by definition a bad rule or statute and I’d like to see some other one similar – I bet there are none. The state requires 60% on ballot initiatives.

    If anyone but political hacks are reviewing this issue, they should scrub the charter school and let those in favor come back when they actually have some support. They didn’t have it when it “passed”.

  • By the SBAC’s logic the City must be de facto owners of all businesses, and homes too.

    Here’s why:

    The Newberry Charter parent group came to the City for application with their initiative just like a business. Same goes for someone seeking a housing build permit.

    The City of Newberry did not extend any additional courtesy to the Newberry Charter group than anyone else.

    Our staff’s mission, as outlined by the Commission, is to find a way to say “Yes” to our businesses, residents, and those who potentially can become both.

    At the end of the day the SBAC frankly has bigger fish to fry. The last two articles outline clear functional and fiscal challenges the SBAC is facing.

    For example:

    An ENTIRE grade level at Rawlings unable to read, A seemingly surprise $33M budget shortfall, “Spending out the wazoo” per Superintendent Patton, busses not running on time, teacher salaries, the State on the verge of taking over because of the fiscal mismanagement.

    The SBAC has made the Newberry Charter initiative personal and punitive. It needs to stop.

    • I would say the last two articles clearly outline dysfunction and incompetent spending.

  • Time again to play, “Spot the Weasel Words”:

    “an argument can be made that it appears to be a de facto municipal conversion charter application, which is not permitted by law.”

  • Why are the board members paid so much more than the teachers? Teachers spend their own money to keep a classroom running. Board members spend our money.

      • They’re making about 10X what they’re worth and are as overpaid as the new Superintendent.
        Anybody with any common sense would have stopped investing in this group of idiots a long time ago. There’s been no ROI for their spending.

  • If the idiots on the school board spent just 1/2 of their time just doing their job properly, Newberry wouldn’t have withdrawn to charter status and the rest of our schools would be in much better shape as well, the children actually getting an education. What this board has done to local education is criminal, IMO. Stop fighting every rule/law you don’t like (and wasting taxpayer money) and DO YOUR JOB!

  • The school board didn’t vote to gut their budget by sending voucher money to rich people for private school nor did they create a process for making the difficult and radical change from a public to charter school – – and thus further weakening public schools – that doesn’t require even a simple majority vote for approval, let alone a supermajority which is often required for serious changes to the status quo. The state GOP did all that, something no one on this unrepresentative comment board wants to talk about.

  • Yalls need to quit worrying about the school board. We know it a joke. Falls need to push for the chuckle chestnut football complex so that the Eastside got something to do. Get it????

  • >