fbpx

SOE Kim Barton offers response to letter about rejection of SOE Candidate Judith Jensen’s petitions

Letter to the editor

Editor’s note: Barton’s letter is a response to a May 26 Letter to the Editor.

Judith Jensen filed to run for Alachua County Supervisor of Elections (SOE) on July 27, 2023. At that time, she informed the SOE staff that assisted her that she intended to qualify by petition method. At that meeting, she was told, just like all candidates seeking to qualify by petition method, that she should not hold the collected petitions but instead should submit her first batch of 100 petitions with her campaign check in the amount of $180.90. That is the total cost she would need to pay to verify the total petitions needed (1,809 at .10 per petition).

We ask candidates to do this so that they can find out if there is a pattern in their submitted petitions, such as a required field that is repeatedly being missed, which is causing the candidate’s petitions to be rejected. With this information, the candidate can remind those assisting them in gathering petitions to focus on those areas on the petition form. Ms. Jensen waited until April 9, 2024, to submit her first batch of 1,177 petitions, 9 months after signing up to run. When she submitted her first batch of petitions, she also submitted a signed Undue Burden Oath. Ms. Jensen next submitted petitions on April 30, 2024, with a batch of 341 petitions, and then an additional 19 petitions were submitted later that day. On May 10, 2024, she submitted 227 petitions, and on the deadline date of May 13, 2024, she submitted 215 petitions and then returned before the noon deadline to submit an additional 23 petitions.

In all, Ms. Jensen submitted a total of 1,997 petitions to be verified. Of the 1,997 petitions, 1,741 petitions were verified as valid, and 256 petitions were rejected. It is important to note that out of the 256 rejected petitions, 78 petitions were duplicate petitions. These are submitted petitions from voters that had previously already signed a candidate petition for Ms. Jensen. There are many other reasons for rejections outlined in Florida Rule 1S-2.045 “Candidate Petition Process” such as required fields being left blank. When reviewing petitions, the required voter information must be correct as submitted in their voter registration record. Listed below are the reasons for rejecting each of the 256 petitions.

Ms. Jensen needed a total of 1,809 valid petitions to qualify by the petition method. She submitted a total of 1,997 petitions to be verified. Even if every signature submitted had matched the voter signature on file, Ms. Jensen would still be short of the required number of valid petitions needed because of the aforementioned reasons for rejections.

Florida Statute 97.012(17) requires mandatory formal signature matching training for all Florida County Supervisors of Elections, all Florida County Canvassing Board members, and any person whose duties require verification of signatures. Alachua County Canvassing Board members and elections staff conducting signature matching, as well as myself, have gone through the annual signature matching training. As Supervisor of Elections, I have not directly verified any petitions submitted by any candidate running for office. The Supervisor of Elections staff conduct their duties with the highest ethical standards and with integrity, and I would expect nothing less from them.

Ms. Jensen made a public records request to review the rejected signature petitions. My staff arranged a time of her choosing to review the petition signatures against the signature(s) on file. She was able to view all available signatures on file in the voter record. When staff reviewed the petition signatures, they did not only look at the recent signature on file, but they also looked at previous signatures for comparison, as outlined in Florida Statute 98.077. Ms. Jensen’s petitions were checked for quality assurance by two staff members, which is the procedure for all submitted petitions.

All candidates have the ability to submit petitions early and often to ensure that Supervisor of Elections staff can alert them to any deficiencies before it is too late.

This is the advice that we give to all candidates.

Kim A. Barton
Supervisor of Elections
Alachua County

The opinions expressed by letter or opinion writers are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of AlachuaChronicle.com. Assertions of facts in letters are similarly the responsibility of the author. Letters may be submitted to info@alachuachronicle.com and are published at the discretion of the editor.

  • I doubt Ms. Barton finds any reason to disqualify mail-in ballots. Because as a Democrat, her mantra is “every (Democrat) vote counts.

    • There are supposed to be rules in place that prevent any implications of impropriety by the county supervisor of elections office.

      One such rule is, if you, or your substitute, have a horse in the race you are not allowed to serve on the county canvassing board.

      Did that rule get enforced? I ask because the implementation of it has been blurred in the past.

      As recent as the ’22 election the BoCC has had the chair, or a substitute member serve on the canvassing board when the BoCC clearly had a horse in the race; i.e., infrastructure sales tax.

      The canvassing board should be above reproach given the power it has in determining election outcomes.
      More attention should be paid to this matter.

      • “More attention should be paid to this matter.”

        Agreed, so lets unpack this some.

        Canvassing Board is NOT involved in the voting process at this point per state law; not county/city law, regulation, or SOE whim.

        Canvassing Broad composition is specified by, once again, state law.

        Conflicts of interest are determined and resolved by, you guessed it, state law.

    • “I doubt Ms. Barton finds any reason to disqualify mail-in ballots.”

      The SOE does NOT determine the reason for disqualification of ballots, mail-in or otherwise. Disqualification is specified by state law and is a public process.

      Volunteer to work the polls sometime and learn all about how elections actually work [including the secret Democrat passwords and handshakes used to rig elections!].

  • All you republicans, stop running for office in Alachua County! You’re just wasting time, money, and your breath. The majority of voters here are Democrats and will not vote for any republican.

    • Times are changing Paulie Boy. The hue is starting to look pretty red.

        • Are you really sure? Maybe Uncle Ron is going to make some changes and throw some Liptards in jail and the rest to the wolves. You never know what is around the first corner..

        • And now you might be able to figure out why Alachua county has the highest utility rates and second highest property taxes in the state. Liberals just can’t handle the truth.

    • Any person who always blindly votes for any one party needs to be punched in their face.

  • She should not be in charge of determining if other candidates qualify. Talk about asking for corruption…!

  • Deadlines are deadlines. In 2023 SOE staff told Jensen one of the biggest truisms of elections: don’t wait till the last minute. I do not believe state law requires the SOE to tell people this. Staff went above and beyond the minimum required by law to help this candidate. It is the inexperienced candidate’s fault for not following good advice. Enough of the Republican whine. Learn and Follow the rules. You are not Trump, only He is exempt from all rules.

    • Discombobulated Joe is also. His prison term is coming soon. Plus the rest of his family.

  • Kim Barton and her staff rejected 49 of 61,819 (0.079%) of mail-in ballots in the Nov 2020 election.

    They rejected 25 of 31,463 (0.079%) in the Nov 2022 election

    Miraculously, they rejected 60 of 1,919 (3.1%) of the petitions needed to challenge Kim Barton for her job.

    What an incredible coincidence. Looking forward to the day Kim Barton finally goes to prison.

    • You are comparing two different things. Ballots are only sent to already registered voters, with clear instructions. We would expect a small rejection percentage. Qualification petitions are collected by inexperienced volunteers on a hot sidewalk outside a Walmart or a Wawa, talking to random members of the public. Of course there will be many more duds collected. You Republicans just like to play victim and whine “unfair” and “discrimination” like your Leader the 34x Felon. Run someone against Chestnut in a single member district, or STFU.

    • She will probably trip over her own feet walking into the cell and sue the prison

  • I don’t trust much the current SOE has to say. this is the 1 who sued a polling precinct because she wore inappropriate shoes and tripped. also, the 1 that wasn’t able to get an adequate number of ballots to polling places in the past(of course there were plenty of democrat ballots at those polling places)

  • The state law needs to change if it allows employees of the current SOE to oversee the process of approving competion against their boss.

  • >