State Attorney notifies Alachua County he will no longer prosecute violations of waiting period for firearms

BY JENNIFER CABRERA
Updated on June 5 with a statement from the Mountain States Legal Foundation and Attorney General Uthmeier
ALACHUA COUNTY, Fla. – State Attorney Brian Kramer has notified Alachua County that he will not prosecute violations of the County’s waiting period for purchasing firearms because of an agreement that is pending in a United States District Court.
The lawsuit, Dunn v. Glass (8:25-cv-02264-SDM-AEP), challenged any waiting period that extends beyond the time required to perform a background check, and Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier wrote in his Offer of Judgment, “Those waiting period restrictions burden the right to keep and bear arms. As the government cannot meet its burden to establish a historical tradition of regulation that justifies an arbitrary waiting period unconnected to the time required to complete a background check, they are unconstitutional under the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, as made applicable to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment.”
“We are so grateful to the Attorney General for facilitating a timely resolution of this case,” said Director of MSLF’s Center to Keep and Bear Arms, Michael McCoy. “They and the 21 other defendants in the case have come to agree with us that Florida’s firearms waiting period laws have nothing to do with public safety – in fact, they make people less safe; and instead only make it more difficult for law-abiding citizens to exercise their Second Amendment-protected rights to keep and bear arms. For that reason, these laws need to be abandoned. And it looks like that is exactly what is going to happen in Florida. And, with our partners at the NRA, we will continue to work hard to spread this trend across the entire country!”
Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier posted on X, “Every government office, including mine, exists to protect your God-given rights as enshrined in the U.S. Constitution. That’s why we’re settling a landmark federal case that declares Florida’s 3-day firearm purchase waiting period unconstitutional under the Second Amendment.”
Kramer wrote that Alachua County’s five-day waiting period “rests upon the same constitutional authority and advances the same type of waiting-period restriction” addressed in the proposed settlement agreement in Dunn v. Glass.
Kramer wrote, “[T]his office will not prosecute alleged violations of Alachua County Ordinance 2018-18 following entry of final judgment” in Dunn v. Glass. He continued, “Where the State itself has agreed that a criminal provision cannot be constitutionally enforced under controlling Second Amendment principles, I do not believe it is appropriate for this office to pursue criminal prosecutions based upon materially identical waiting-period requirements absent further direction from the courts and substantive revocation of this settlement agreement.”
Kramer wrote that County ordinances are within the authority of the County Commission, so he was simply providing notification that he will not enforce the County’s ordinance if the Court enters a final judgment that is consistent with the Offer of Judgment.

Hopefully the Alachua County Sheriff’s Office will provide a reasonable response to this. The public needs to know what to expect. We need to know if they’re siding with the courts or with the county commission on this issue.
Basically what he is saying is you no longer have to wait 5 days to take your handgun home as soon as they run your background check and it comes back clean usually about 30 minutes. You can walk out with your handgun in your hand. Another great win for the second amendment.
Actually, my read is, he defaulted to the state law that has a three day wait. Provided you don’t have a permit to carry.
Alachua County moved to a five-day period.
Once this order is finalized, all waiting periods will be unconstitutional in Florida. AG Uthmeier declared that waiting periods (all of them – this case was against the state of Florida, not Alachua County) are unconstitutional.
However, the order is just a formality since the AG has already declared that he will not uphold Florida’s waiting period statute under prosecutorial discretion. Kramer followed suit.
Thank you, Jennifer.
Your clarification has helped a great deal.
You have a wonderful news outlet.
Thank you for all the hard work. The Chronicle gives the best and most complete public affairs reporting anywhere.
G: this is how I’m interpreting this…Kramer made this unclear.
states might not be able to regulate holding periods now be causes it interferes with your inalienable right to protect yourself….
Appreciate all the responses. I obviously misread this! Makes sense now.
This deliberate choice not to prosecute the county ordinance—a decision I support—means local enforcement will shift with the political winds of whoever holds the SAO office. Maybe the local electorate will understand some of our concerns a little better now.
After this court ruling the alachua County ordinance is illegal and cannot be enforced
Now that the reading comprehension challenged have shown their obvious misinterpretation of my comment…
I stated that I agreed with Kramer’s decision to NOT prosecute violations of Alachua County’s 5-day waiting period. Some who have real difficulty understanding that were able to exercise their 1st Amendment right; good for them. Now if they could just understand the context of the rest of the conversation, the world may actually get over part of the stupidity taking over.
I thought that the State of Florida had abrogated all gun-related laws and rules below the State level some time ago?
After that school shooting by that 18 year old kid in Ft. Lauderdale, Alachua county changed the statewide 3 day waiting period, to 5 days for Alachua County..
There is still a 3 business day wait.
https://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0700-0799/0790/Sections/0790.0655.html
Voted: What you posted was for 2025, this is 2026..
Voted: you are wrong! There is no longer a 3 business day wait!
you got a load of 👎…
🫎🚀💥
Did Rocky help with picking the emojis?
If you have a (CWP) concealed weapons permit, and your FDLE background check comes back as an approval , there was never any waiting period…
Does this mean if you buy a gun now, and your FDLE background check comes back as an approval, there’s no statewide 3 day waiting period anymore?
Alachua county has the 5 day waiting period…Marion county was just the states’ 3 day waiting period…
For clarity, The states 3 day waiting period has been abolished?
That’s if you have a CWP already. 2025 is the latest and greatest.
What I provided the link to was the Florida Statute that provides the governing legislation.
Some people still don’t like it though. Personally, 3 days is good for reasons we’ve read about way to often here on the Chronicle.
Voted: that federal ruling may have changed the state statute
I’m still unclear…
your link was Fl 2025 statute.
.this is 2026 and that 2025 state statute might be getting updated…
the sale of guns is still a federal thing, the 4473 form is a federal thing…
Gun dealers use the state of Florida FDLE here for background checks because we’re in Florida, but other states might use a national background check…
we’re in Florida, so I know what Florida uses…
So what’s the link to the statute Florida uses? To the best of my knowledge, there are no changes to purchase laws other than LEOs but I welcome any updates. Everyone has access to the Florida Statutes – give me something besides speculation.
Voted:
are you a licensed firearms dealer?
Did you know all of this was in the pipeline?
This is just happening now, and the left hand doesn’t know what the right hand is doing…
“ALACHUA COUNTY, Fla. – State Attorney Brian Kramer has notified Alachua County that he will not prosecute violations of the County’s waiting period for purchasing firearms because of an agreement that is pending in a United States District Court.
“The lawsuit, Dunn v. Glass (8:25-cv-02264-SDM-AEP), challenged any waiting period that extends beyond the time….”
states might not be able to regulate holding periods now be causes it interferes with your inalienable right to protect yourself….
Federal firearms dealers have yet to be notified yet…nothing from NRA yet either that I know about..
Read the statute. It clearly states “(1)(a) A mandatory waiting period is imposed between the purchase and delivery of a firearm. The mandatory waiting period is 3 days, excluding weekends and legal holidays, or expires upon the completion of the records checks required under s. 790.065, whichever occurs later.”
Except as permitted by the exclusionary allowances, one of which you’ve already mentioned. Not that difficult to understand and a person doesn’t need a dealer’s license or a law degree to get the meaning. (Shouldn’t anyway).
As your comment also pointed out: “The lawsuit, Dunn v. Glass (8:25-cv-02264-SDM-AEP), challenged any waiting period that extends beyond the time….” That decision IN THIS STATE has not been made. From my understanding of Kramer’s stance, he will not prosecute any violations of Alachua County’s 5-day wait because it is clearly not in line with the State’s laws governed by the above statute.
That’s the way it is (the statute), whether people like it or not—at least until a higher authority changes it.
In response to Alachua Chronicle’s breaking this story, the AG stated publicly today that Florida’s law will no longer be prosecuted:
“Every government office, including mine, exists to protect your God-given rights as enshrined in the U.S. Constitution.
That’s why we’re settling a landmark federal case that declares Florida’s 3-day firearm purchase waiting period unconstitutional under the Second Amendment.”
https://x.com/AGJamesUthmeier/status/2062895064431374581?s=20
Thanks!
I read he wouldn’t prosecute those violating Alachua County’s law.
“State Attorney Brian Kramer has notified Alachua County that he will not prosecute violations of the County’s waiting period…”
I didn’t see mention of the Florida Statutory requirement though.
Maybe he’ll clarify with certainty his intent?
Kramer’s letter specifically addressed Alachua County’s ordinance because, as state attorney, it is his job to prosecute their ordinances. But the lawsuit settlement will make all waiting periods unconstitutional in the whole state, and the AG stated on X that he already considers this to be the case.
Thanks again!
Nice the AG’s office clarified it today since the original story broke yesterday. (Without the added specifics and details).
You’re far better than most in keeping the public informed of events that may impact their lives.👏🏻🥳
Seriously, this is an excellent resource for knowing what is going on regionally.
Jennifer: you’re the best!
Thanks for your always unbiased reporting and true journalism…
your readers appreciate the venue where we can discuss local issues, whether we all agree on them or not…
you & the AC are true local treasures…
thanks for everything you do ! 😃
By the way, the stance some are taking—that the decision is already effectively made simply because the law is being challenged—puts the cart before the horse. It is like arguing it was legal to drive 70 mph on I-75 when the speed limits were 55 mph, just because a speed limit increase was being debated.
Good talk.
It’s exactly the same as the open carry case. The law was found to be unconstitutional. The law did not change, but it became unconstitutional to enforce it. That is what is happening here.
True, but in this instance it hasn’t been declared unconstitutional yet. It’s still being decided.
If the state (the defendant) is not contesting the lawsuit, it’s over. The state agreed with the petitioner that the law is unconstitutional. It’s a settlement, which means the judge will not make a decision. The settlement ends the case.
You voted; I’m sending you one of Invitados’ 🥔 “moosemissles”…🚀💥❗️
This holding period only applies to licensed federal firearms dealers anyway…
“An individual can buy & sell as many firearms they want as long as they don’t make a profit” with no waiting periods!
I got that from the regional director of ATF many years ago when churches were doing their toys for gun feel good stuff..
Changing the subject? They do that too. The statute is as stated. Until some higher legal authority says it’s unconstitutional anyway. Didn’t DeSantis remove a state prosecutor a couple years ago who ignored state laws? Kramer isn’t ignoring a state law, he’s enforcing the one on the books, not the purely political 5-day wait the County enacted.
I appreciate the moosemissiles. Maybe Jake can come up with a great cartoon for the weekend too.
You Voted:
“Once this order is finalized, ALL ( you don’t need a law degree to know what “all “ means) waiting periods will be unconstitutional in Florida. AG Uthmeier declared that waiting periods (all of them – this case was against the state of Florida, not Alachua County) are unconstitutional.
However, the order is just a formality since the AG has already declared that he will not uphold Florida’s waiting period statute under prosecutorial discretion. Kramer followed suit.”
J. Cabrera
You voted: Will you say you stand corrected now?
You seem to have forgotten, all I provided was the statute that outlined the lawful requirements.
As such, the State agreed the statute was unconditional. The reason from Jennifer’s explanation above is the State agreed with the petitioner. Strictly by the statute as written, there was until this challenge, a 3-day wait. The 5-day Alachua County wait—while permitted also by state statute—was clearly in violation of the 3-day period by state law. A contradiction of sorts.
Corrected? You’re implying I was wrong about the state statute. Some clarification has been made and that benefits everyone.
Are you willing to admit the statute was presented as stated? Up until the “challenge,” it was always considered law. Otherwise you, me, or anyone else would have challenged it.
Bullwinkle?
Voted : you kept arguing there was a 3 day wait…
there’s no more waiting periods in the state of Florida.
You got that?
You don’t need to be a lawyer to figure that out..🫎 🚀💥
You certainly got a lot of 👎 too!
Check my posts, reliable info and many 👍…
You stepped in some 🫎💩🤣❗️
I stated what the statute said. Pride goeth before the fallen and there’s more strength in humility than boastfulness and pride.
You’ve just confirmed what you lack.
I think there may be exemptions for law enforcement, corrections and active duty military.
That change seems to have happened in 2025.
It always seemed odd to me that an officer with one on their hip and at least one in the car could buy a pistol on their lunch break and have to wait three days if they didn’t have a permit a regular citizen had.
Despite the 👎🏻s, there was. As always, people choose to see what they want to see.
Can parents still buy their mentally ill/trans kids guns? That’s the only restriction needed, since all other gun crimes are with STOLEN firearms.
Real: gun dealers have to have posted in 1” letters that can’t sell to under 18, or of unsound mind, etc
But what about their parents?
It’s a felony if a parent leaves a Firearm within easy access of a minor.. you also cannot transfer a firearm to someone of unsound mind..