Tanzer: What is the shape of Gainesville?

This map detail shows Gainesville’s primary roads and railroads in relation to nearby towns in the late 19th century. It was published in the 1883 book Midland Florida, The Eden of the South.

OPINION

BY KIM TANZER

When we travel, many of us consciously or subconsciously assess the “shape” of the city we are visiting. If we’re in Savannah, we might look at a map and see the river and perhaps the characteristic grid of the historic city to know where to look for a restaurant or hotel. In any beach town, we find the ocean, then seek the road running along it to discover vibrant commercial activity. We often rely on maps and may speculate about how cities are laid out based on their terrain, primary roadways, iconic buildings, and the varied fabric of their repetitive buildings. Studying these urban systems, we may come to understand why and where cities were founded and how they have grown across decades or centuries.

Because we live here, many have not devoted the same attention to understanding Gainesville. Today, using the analytic concepts of urban designers, I hope to help readers visualize the shape of Gainesville. 

Urban designers typically study cities by drawing them, often separating systems (water, roads, etc.) from each other on separate sheets of paper, or layers. Earlier paper-based layers of drawings have been replaced by digital GIS mapping, and most municipalities use these mapping tools in their work. Locally, both Alachua County and the Alachua County Property Appraiser provide the public with accessible GIS-based layers, so readers can explore our urban area’s systems for yourselves. Below I describe a few of Gainesville’s primary systems.

This detail, from the 1904 U.S. Dept. of Agriculture Soils Map, shows the Hogtown Prairie, which was far to the west of the City of Gainesville at that time. The road jogging northwest at the top of this image is now NW 16th Avenue/NW 16th Boulevard/NW 23rd Avenue.

Terrain. The shape of any town is largely defined by its terrain—its landforms (topography) and water features (hydrology). Putting these together, we immediately have a striking but largely unappreciated explanation of Gainesville’s shape.

The state’s “continental divide” runs through Gainesville and is located around the high point of the 1861 Cedar Key-Fernandina Beach railroad. Gainesville straddles Florida’s ridge, with half of our water governed by the St. John’s Water Management District and the other half by the Suwannee River Water Management District. Unique to Gainesville, though, is the fact that none of our water flows to either the Atlantic or the Gulf of Mexico. Instead, our water flows to lakes, rivers, or streams that empty directly into the aquifer. We might think of Gainesville as one large bathtub, with several primary drains or “sinks.”

Water flows away from the center of Gainesville in three general directions. East of Waldo Road, Hatchett Creek and other streams flow to Newnan’s Lake. Roughly between Waldo Road and West 13th Street, water flows through Sweetwater and Tumblin Creeks south to Paynes Prairie. West of 13th Street, the vast Hogtown Creek system runs from North U.S. 441 (and 13th Street) southwest to Lake Kanapaha, where it enters a sink. Separately, most water on the UF campus flows into Lake Alice, then directly into the aquifer. 

This early 20th-century postcard shows the bridge and roadway crossing Hogtown Creek.

Much of the traffic backlog coming from west Gainesville can be explained by the obstacles created by the Hogtown Creek wetland, running from University Avenue to Archer Road, while some of East Gainesville’s underdevelopment is a result of extensive wetlands draining to Newnan’s Lake.

Roadways. The second major system defining the shape of any city is its road network. Gainesville’s oldest roads are named after towns that either preceded Gainesville or developed at the same time. Some follow former railroad lines. These include Waldo and Hawthorne Roads to the east and Williston, Archer, and Newberry Roads to the west. Though Highway 441 is not named for Alachua, High Springs, or Micanopy, it provides a living link to those very old towns. 

Beyond these roads, many of Gainesville’s primary roads create a kind of supergrid: East 9th Street, Main Street, and West 6th, 13th, 34th, 43rd, and 75th Streets run north and south. Running east and west are University Avenue, 8th and 16th Avenues (both north and south), and North 39th and 53rd Avenues. Two interesting exceptions are NW 16th Boulevard/23rd Avenue and NW 23rd Street Boulevard/Glen Springs Road. Both zigzag northwest and appear to follow much older historic roadways. Another important roadway is I-75, built in the 1970s and influencing the city’s growth ever since.

Nodes, or “activity centers.” Often commercial activity occurs at major intersections, not just in Gainesville but in any city, across time. In Gainesville, we find commercial centers at many of these intersections: University Avenue intersects Waldo/Williston Road, Main Street, West 6th, 13th, 34th, and 75th Streets. North 39th Avenue intersects Waldo Road at the airport, along with NE 15th Street, Main Street, NW 6th, 13th, and 43rd Streets, where commercial areas are found. North 16th Avenue has significant commercial activity at NE 9th Street, Main Street, and west 6th, 13th, and 43rd Streets. Butler Plaza, Celebration Pointe, the Oaks Mall, and Springhill are all located where major local roads intersect I-75.

Iconic places. These are the places historically featured on postcards or, today, in selfies posted on Instagram. They form our collective sense of place. In Gainesville, most would agree that Depot Park, the Hippodrome, the Thomas Center, portions of the UF campus, Paynes Prairie, Sweetwater Park, the Devil’s Millhopper, and Kanapaha Gardens merit this special recognition.

Built “fabric.” A city’s built fabric–block after block of repetitive buildings–quietly defers to iconic buildings, spotlighting them by contrasting with them. But, across any city, not all built fabric is the same. We might think of any city’s fabric as a patchwork quilt of different distinctive patterns. 

Typically, housing is the primary building type comprising a city’s fabric, and it varies based on age, construction techniques, transportation types, socio-economic circumstances, and fashions. The size and shape of buildings, along with block size (or lack thereof) and street width all contribute to characteristic built fabrics. 

Gainesville’s fabric is easily understandable and consistent with the city’s growth pattern. Around the downtown area and east to Waldo Road, many buildings are large and squarish—kind of blocky. Streets are gridded, and they mostly have sidewalks separated from the streets with grassy “verges.” This was the start of Gainesville, which in the 19th century stretched east and west equally. Just south and west of downtown, in much smaller, mostly one-story homes, on smaller lots with narrower streets and no sidewalks, lived Gainesville’s 19th– and early 20th-century African-American population in Fifth Avenue, Porters Quarters, and Springhill. 

This map, titled “Plat Map of Gainesville, Florida 1853-1958” was hand-colored by a UF architecture student, showing the evolution of Gainesville’s neighborhoods by decades. The 1940s, for instance, are colored yellow.

In 1905, land was donated to locate the University of Florida at the southwest corner of University Avenue and 13th Street. This changed the shape of the city. 

From that time, more new housing was built closer to the University, then increasingly further west. A few examples are College Park, Hibiscus Park, and Golfview, platted in the 1920s. 

Soon after WW2, new single-family developments sprang up to provide housing for returning GIs and an increased UF student body, including Carol Estates, Magnolia Heights, Sugarfoot, and Florida Park in the 1940s and 1950s, with larger lots, low-slung mid-century ranch-style houses, and no sidewalks. 

Later still, Suburban Heights, Azalea Trails, Forest Ridge, and other areas continued the characteristic mid-century fabric. In the 1970s and 1980s, Haile, Cumberland Circle, Ridgewood, Monterey, and Brywood were built in the style of the day, often on larger, partially wooded lots, with wider roads and cul-de-sacs but no sidewalks. 

As I-75 became operational, more neighborhoods followed newer shopping and newer schools to the west of the city. 

Then, in the 1990s and 2000s, again echoing national trends, developers began building neighborhoods with two-story houses on smaller lots with sidewalks, reminiscent of early 20th-century neighborhoods. Tioga, Sorrento, and Hillcrest are examples of this type of fabric.

This screenshot from the Alachua County Map Genius overlays the FEMA flood zones on the base map layer.

Natural Systems. As described above, Hogtown Creek and its tributaries act as a giant green wall nearly cutting Gainesville in two. Other large natural systems also play important roles in shaping Gainesville. Paynes Prairie to the south, San Felasco Hammock to the north, and Newnan’s Lake to the east all constrain urban development, nudging it west. These large natural systems, and Gainesville’s many small local parks, also contribute to the shape of Gainesville.

Throughout this brief analysis I have focused on our entire urban area as it is today. This objective analysis is a critical starting point. My focus has been not just on the city’s historic center but on all the places people live and work. 

When I envision Gainesville, I see not a hub (downtown) and spokes (suburbs) but a network, with many equally vibrant local “villages” surrounded by forests and sometimes separated by creeks. Planners have begun to describe such cities as “polycentric.” 

As you read my description of Gainesville, and perhaps look at maps, websites, social media sites, or travel around the city, what is the shape of the city you discover? What would make it better?

Kim Tanzer lives in Gainesville. She is a former UF architecture professor, who was also dean of the University of Virginia School of Architecture.

The opinions expressed by letter or opinion writers are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of AlachuaChronicle.com. Letters may be submitted to info@alachuachronicle.com and are published at the discretion of the editor.

    • Yes, it was horrible to read that Tanzer discovered that all of Gainesville was designed so that the dirty trash, homeless feces, used needles and other disgusting things from Gainesville run off into the prairie, creeks, and lakes that surround Gainesville. Who designed this literal toilet bowl of a city? I bet it was the same type of people who decided to create power by cutting down and burning CO2 absorbing trees and then called themselves “Tree City USA” (LMAO). These liberals and UF professors have been getting it wrong from the start and thanks to Kim Tanzer for providing the evidence that proves it.

  • When I envision Gainesville, I see a blown out tire at the center – Downtown.
    Spokes that have been broken and stolen – East Gainesville.
    A bulging outer periphery in the Western portions of Alachua County because people are attempting to escape the excessive bloat of City leaders and their incompetence – Alachua, Jonesville, Newberry.
    An out of balance area west of 34th & north of Archer Rd because of the piss poor traffic management – Butler Paza areas.

    What would make it better? Don’t know exactly but the current leadership isn’t doing much.

  • Very thorough and interesting. Thank you for a new perspective on our beautiful city

  • I think for many of us in Alachua County, we go into Gainesville for work, but prefer to shop on the outskirts of the city because of the terrible traffic and parking situation in the city. It seems unwelcoming to anyone who is driving themselves, and lately, much less safe with the panhandlers and break-ins.

    Can the fabric of a city be defined by what happens in it, as well as what has been built there?

    I really appreciate this article – I didn’t realize how many natural barriers there are, which does explain why getting across town takes so long. There are chokepoints for traffic because of the water systems.

    I like the description of the area as a network rather than a hub with spokes. Very helpful – thank you!

  • Excellent article!

    One minor point – I-75 around Newberry Road was new, but there in 1969. I know this because I hitched to Atlanta to visit a friend that year, starting at that point.

    In previous years, coming up from S Florida for UF, we drove US 441 to Gainesville. In 1962, on a trip to visit my sister and husband in Tennessee where he was in college, we drove through Gainesville on a Saturday – big mistake! Game day and a good part of 441 coming from Ocala was still 2 lanes and it was bumper to bumper for miles.

  • It’s simpler than that, really. The area has grown organically around whatever the largest transportation “pipe” was at the time, and flowed around the barriers, both natural and artificial. Follow the history, from the train line, to Main Street, to the “new” highway 441, then the “new” highway I-75.

    Newcomers to town should know two simple navigational clues:
    1) many large roads in Gainesville are named for the city they go to, and
    2) APR(I)L: Avenues, Places, Roads, and Lanes go east and west; everything else goes north and south, except for Drives and Boulevards, which can go “anywhichway” (sorry for the DOT technical jargon)

  • Kim, first and foremost: THANK YOU, for this excellent article. As someone new to Gainesville (moved here one year ago), I found it very informative. I have not explored Gainesville enough to lend any input as to my opinion of it’s “shape.” It strikes me that I-75 seems to be a our “main street,” connecting with most of my shopping and dropping kids off areas for various sports centers etc. And since arriving, my wife and I have been struck by how… de-centralized the “city” is. There are no sky scrapers or a clearly defined “financial district” as there are in other cities. Downtown, for us, is the area where we go to restaurants like Dragonfly (which is excellent by the way), Harrys and Mark’s Prime. But there is the busy area of Archer Road, Tioga town center, Jonesville, and others that we frequent for various reasons, stores and restaurants. In terms of what would make the city better, for us it would be a better mall with a Nordstroms, Saks, Needless Markup (Neiman Markus), Dillards, Macy’s etc., a Capital Grille/Seasons 52 and maybe a J’ Alexanders restaurant, maybe a Costco, but the demographics of the area don’t seem to currently support that. Maybe if the area had the population to support all of those stores we wouldn’t like it as much as we do now — it might come with more traffic congestion, houses that are closer together, etc. For now, we drive to Jacksonville’s Saint John Town Center for those stores and experiences — and suffer the traffic and density issues that accompany them. The city and broader area are near perfect in many ways: a college town and therefore solid medical providers and more than one good hospital option, relatively light traffic (if you compare it to Miami or Fort Lauderdale), friendly people for the most part, and a good deal of foliage / green spaces. Visit Nashville and you can see all that goes wrong with too much concrete and not enough trees in terms of city planning (concrete jungle, no trees or grass). The only thing that I wish for Gainesville is a police force committed to catching and incarcerating as many violent criminals as they can get their hands on, a DA who will prosecute ALL offenders for ALL their crimes (but especially violent ones) and judges who don’t let them out to commit more crimes while they await trial. I’m astonished that the city government cannot seem to get its act together and make roads passable! NW 173rd street in the city of Alachua is NOT passable! Literally, it eats tires and wheels. No one drives on that road anymore! How is that possible — in the many cities and states I’ve lived, I’ve never seen roads this neglected! Isn’t that the baseline of what we should expect from a city or county government? (now I’ll slowly step down from my soap box). For all that is good about Alachua, it’s trees, green spaces, creeks, lakes, and nature seem to be what make it livable. Long term, I hope city planners don’t allow developments that create too much density in too small spaces. Thank you again, Kim, for such a thoughtful and insightful article. Very well done.

    • For all that’s good about *Gainesville* that was supposed to say. My beloved *City* of Alachua (versus the county) sometimes sneaks into my writing.

    • As a fourth generation ACR once told me, ‘Everybody wants Gainesville to stay the same as it was when _they_ first got here’.

      • Except for the violent crime and lenient judges, I get it.

      • When we moved to South Florida my dad repeated a quip that the weatherman said: “Everyone who moves here thinks they ought to be the last one let in.”

        Years later it occurred to me: “Yeah, Dad, but one of ’em was RIGHT.”

  • Thanks Kim for an excellent article. I agree that Gainesville is a “network” of “local villages surrounded by forests and sometimes separated by creeks”. And I like it that way. But this is changing, particularly in the surrounding county areas. Drive around and you see the “forests” are being replaced by new boxy housing developments (take Archer Road). People are still driving to the city to go to work at University/Shands/City/County Administration. Roads need improving, both for safety and ease of driving.

  • First, great article, thank you. What would make it better? Perhaps a more comprehensive plan for the future. One that didn’t favor part time residents but favored those of us who live here. I live just North of the stadium off of 8th avenue, and am one of the say 50% of residents who own and live on my street. The rest of the homes are rentals. I love it here and I’m from here, as were my mom and dad. As a one time small business owner, that found first hand how the city leaders hate or ignore small business in favor of large multi-national corporations, and real estate developers, I’ve never understood why we couldn’t plan a little better without spending gobs of money on ‘studies’ that conclude what the proponents wanted the whole time. Examples abound, one is the two lining of Main Street. Just before that happened, we had on street parking after 6pm, which effectively two laned it, but provided down town parking. Of course the ‘study’ said, two lanes would be fine. Residents that have to commute on Main, soon realized they’d have to find a route around to get where they were going.

    These giant apartment buildings changing the look of our city with no regard to much, dominate the sky line now with more still under construction. Many large projects still have vacancies in the soon to be retail operations that aren’t filling planners expected occupancy. Local business’s can’t use these spaces as the rent is ridiculous forcing many of these local business’s away, or out all together. Burrito Bros a famous example along with The Jam another.

    CVS and Walgreens are not why people live or stay in a community. While many locals have moved towards the east and south, locating along Main Street, I can certainly see signs that if successful, they will be squeezed out as well.

    I use to complain that Gainesville was fast on the way to becoming Orlando, but work has taken me there over the past few years, and I’m shocked to say, they have actually managed better with amazing interconnected bike paths, public parks everywhere, and better traffic management.

    My whole life, whatever retail we wanted, we had to go to Jacksonville or now Orlando, and this holds true today. No Costco or Apple Store still? Butler Plaza is classic example of bloated, you can’t get there from here planning and let’s move all those trailers out. Not to mention cut down all the trees.

    Meanwhile we pay more for gasoline more for electricity and going out is just about over for me. I realize this is true for much of America, but we use to have places that were relatively cheap and good.

    GRU seemed to finally start getting it together and our Gov. NitWit decides to ignore state law and appoint people with no experience that didn’t live here say over our locally owned utility. We can complain all we want about GRU prices, but if we don’t control it, it ain’t getting better. The bio-mass plant was obviously a boondoggle that should have never been considered unless it was a dual fuel plant, but we are stuck with it and the debt.

    Now we have people driving crazy, running red lights, killing pedestrians, the roads are shrinking, and crossing town is way faster on a bike. I’m favorable to all means of alternative transportation, but sadly autos are the main use and for many people unavoidable, since we don’t have real public transportation in this country we might try to accommodate folks that have to use the auto.

    I’m optimistic I just wish the pessimist weren’t always right.

    Again, thank you for this article. We do have a rich and vibrant history with so much to be thankful for. I love our city and can’t imagine living anywhere else, having lived in Hawaii, California, Georgia and worked in New Zealand, Japan and many places around the world.

    dean jordan

  • First, I second the comment: Kim Tanzer for Mayor. I taught her on what I think was her first day college and that’s all I needed to know. Second, great article. Especially since I know nothing of your City. My own small town (17K folks) in California is literally bifurcated by a state highway that looks like an Interstate, so the concept of a city’s shape is most interesting to me. A lot of work went into Kim’s article and it’s excellent.

  • Went from nothing to all the develotment now in 150 years, imagine in another 150 years, will be one giant urban area from trenton to newnans lake

  • Kim,
    Great article and starting point for future conversations as to growth, direction, and changes. I hope that your knowledge base of architecture and urban planning are consulted by the powers to be that govern the growth of Gainesville and ultimately Alachua County. Growth is important to all cities but what, where, and how is more important than ever as we are loosing the identities of many of our cities to development that has no sense of place or space. I look forward to you future articles and thank you for bringing this to everyone’s attention.

  • “When I envision Gainesville, I see not a hub (downtown) and spokes (suburbs) but a network, with many equally vibrant local “villages” surrounded by forests and sometimes separated by creeks. Planners have begun to describe such cities as “polycentric.””

    Agree with the “local villages” assessment though, when I first came to Gainesville it was definitely spoke-and-hub.

    What bothers me is how the city commission still sees downtown as the center of the universe, continually pouring money into it while the property owners don’t appear to take much interest in their property other than to collect rent. They seem to just be along for the ride, waiting for a major developer to come along to cash them out.

  • In the early 2000s I founded a non profit focused on encouraging Gainesville to enhance its great potential as a hub creative community and grow its economy based on valuing its natural and cultural resources. Portraying our unique sense of place through the work of our cultural creatives- and to ultimately join other small cities with cultural/tech identities- to attract young entrepreneurs etc.
    Leaders in the field were brought in to give advice- Rebecca Anderson who trained me, Richard Florida, Ed MacMahon-Urban Land Institute all pointed out our potential and gave advice as to how we could grow in the smartest ways possible.
    Although Gainesville largely rejected their expertise; I do have a vision of how downtown can build on what it’s currently doing.
    Happy to meet and chat.

  • >