Motion to repeal Sunday alcohol ordinance fails at joint meeting between High Springs and Alachua County Commissions

The Alachua County Commission and High Springs City Commission held a joint meeting on June 5

BY DAVID LIGHTMAN

HIGH SPRINGS, Fla. – A joint meeting between the High Springs City Commission and the Alachua County Commission was held on June 5 at the High Springs Civic Center. After a long discussion about High Springs’s Sunday alcohol ordinance affecting the High Springs Brewery, a motion to repeal the ordinance failed, 2-2. Other topics discussed were a potential traffic signal or roundabout at U.S. 41 and Poe Springs Road, surtax funding for the Canoe Outpost, and expanding the reach of County resources with Community Resource Centers.

High Springs Mayor Tristan Grunder began by thanking the County Commissioners for coming. High Springs Commissioner Andrew Miller said he wanted to remove the fifth item on the agenda, Repeal of Sunday Alcohol Sales, saying it was a City item and not related to the County. High Springs Commissioner Katherine Weitz agreed. Grunder said, “I disagree. I think it was brought up to the County, and I don’t think there’s anything wrong with listening to citizens talk about things that are concerning to them.” County Commissioner Anna Prizzia said, “It does impact them from a tourism development standpoint… I would love a chance to hear from you all about why you have the policies that you have.” Miller said the County doesn’t like the State telling it what to do, and this was analogous to that. County Commissioner Ken Cornell said, “I’d like to hear the history.”

Miller made a motion to remove the item from the agenda, and Weitz seconded the motion. During a discussion about the County agenda (each body votes on its own agenda in joint meetings), County Commission Chair Chuck Chestnut said, “We’re gonna leave it on,” and the County Commission voted unanimously to keep it on the agenda.

Weitz made a motion to change the agenda description to “Discuss Sunday Alcohol Sales” instead of “Repeal of Sunday Alcohol Sales.” Miller seconded her motion, and it passed 3-1, with Grunder in dissent.

Traffic signal at U.S. 41 and Poe Springs Road

The first item of business was the intersection of U.S. 41 and Poe Springs Road. County Commissioner Marihelen Wheeler said the main topic of an FDOT presentation attached to the agenda was a proposed traffic signal or roundabout at that intersection. Grunder said no one from FDOT was available to attend the meeting, so there was no additional information available.

High Springs Community Reinvestment Area update

The next item was an update on the High Springs CRA. CRA Manager Amy Bohannon said they are looking to expand the CRA from 109 to 167 acres, which will require County approval. She said improving the parking and connectivity of downtown have been their main goals. Bohannon talked about commercial and residential façade grants and other ways the CRA has been making downtown look better. Wheeler said she is excited to see what they are doing, especially the “walkability” aspects. 

Canoe Outpost

The third item was a discussion of the Canoe Outpost. High Springs City Manager Jeremy Marshall said the County has $333,000 of surtax money set aside for a joint project with High Springs, and they decided a few months ago that the Canoe Outpost was a good project to work together on. Marshall said he estimated the full project will cost about $650,000 for all the renovations needed, including making the boat ramp more ADA-accessible. 

Cornell said he supports the project as long as it is driven by the support of local residents, and he told Marshall, “Put the application in.” Prizzia, Wheeler, and County Commissioner Mary Alford also expressed their support. Grunder said, “It would absolutely be used continuously by citizens here.” During public comment on the item, Rick Testa stressed the potential educational significance of the Canoe Outpost.

Community Resource Centers

The next item was a discussion about the Deeper Purpose Community Church of High Springs and its potential use as a Community Resource Center. County Community Support Services Director Claudia Tuck gave a presentation, and Satori Days said the church serves all ages and provides a wide array of services and programs.  

Prizzia said she thinks it’s important to provide County services at outlying Community Resource Centers, and that’s why the item was added to the agenda. Cornell said, “The best way to serve our community is where they are.” Cornell encouraged the church to draw on County resources and supplies to best serve its local residents.

Weitz said there are other local churches and organizations that are also serving as unofficial Resource Centers, and they could also benefit from County resources and partnerships. Cornell said, “I’m interested in hearing from the electeds on the ones that are serving your public.” Weitz said, “Will do.”

Sunday alcohol sales

The fifth item was “Discuss Sunday Alcohol Sales,” after it was changed at the beginning of the meeting from “Repeal of Sunday Alcohol Sales.” Cornell began by saying, “I just want to hear the history.” 

Grunder explained, “We do not sell liquor on Sundays right now [before 1 p.m.]. We do sell beer and wine. We sell beer, wine, and liquor in restaurants as long as they sell over 51% of their stuff with food…. It goes back to the initial Great Outdoors. Remember there was a small… gift shop. The owners then wanted to open it up for beer and wine.” Grunder said that since then, he tried to put the question on the ballot in 2024, but his motion at the time was not seconded. The current business looking to change the law is the High Springs Brewery, which Grunder said is an important part of the town, allowing many people to interact.

Grunder said he felt the issue had become emotional and personal, and he said he believes “there is a very large majority” of citizens who support Sunday alcohol sales and would have voted for it. Grunder said, “We tend to have these things in place, and it’s just because it’s been that way.” Grunder said it affects High Springs tourism, including bed-and-breakfasts and Airbnb rentals. 

Prizzia asked if there is much alcohol-related crime in High Springs. She mentioned people not drinking in churches on Sundays, and Cornell interjected, “That’s where the opposition is coming from.” Prizzia said, “Jesus turned water into wine… It doesn’t make any sense to me.” She returned to her question about “statistical reasons” for restricting Sunday alcohol sales.

Marshall answered that the City implemented a process last year for Special Use Permits to allow alcohol sales on Sundays during certain events, and there had not been any DUIs or noise complaints associated with the Special Use Permits. 

Grunder said it is “unacceptable” to have an ordinance that he called “a one-business flogging.”

Weitz and Miller said they viewed the option of offering Special Use Permits as a compromise. Weitz said many residents “want one day of quiet” and reminded Grunder that the ordinance was in effect when High Springs Brewery opened and “they understood that.” And, she said, a different restaurant cannot sell alcohol on Sundays because it is close to a church, which is prohibited by a different local ordinance that is still in effect. 

Prizzia talked about wanting High Springs to be successful and how the Brewery is a huge economic driver. She said the permits are “an undue requirement” and “an undue burden.” Prizzia concluded, “Maybe you should let your citizens vote on it.”

Wheeler talked about all the children who play together at the Brewery while their parents socialize. She said restaurants don’t offer that.

Cornell said, “I’m a strong, strong believer in home rule. I also know how to count to three votes.” 

Grunder opened public comment on the alcohol sales item. Most commenters supported changing the ordinance immediately or at least putting the question on the ballot, while a few expressed concerns about things like noise. Local business owners emphasized the economic impact of a shorter weekend for visitors. 

Miller said he had another idea for a compromise ordinance and asked whether the City could limit the number of breweries in a certain area or require a certain distance between them, to alleviate noise concerns. Prizzia and Cornell said they thought it could work. Grunder suggested requiring 300 yards between breweries. 

Weitz suggested having 10% of registered voters sign a petition, which would be a step toward placing the question on the ballot. Cornell suggested, “You could just repeal the ordinance,” which led to applause. He suggested directing staff to bring back Miller’s proposed compromise ordinance and exempting High Springs Brewery from any alcohol ordinances as other options.

Motion and vote

Grunder passed the gavel and made a motion to repeal the Sunday alcohol ordinance with a provision that no breweries may be within 200 yards of each other. Marshall said he would need to check the local code and see if the distance restriction would be permissible. Grunder changed his motion to simply repealing the alcohol ordinance, and Chad Howell seconded the motion. The motion failed 2-2, with Weitz and Miller in dissent and Commissioner Wayne Bloodsworth absent throughout the meeting.

Weitz said she favored continuing the conversation at a City Commission Meeting. Marshall said he would review the code and determine whether a distance restriction is possible.

Transportation projects

The last item of business was Transportation Projects Impacting High Springs. Alachua County Transportation Planning Manager Allison Moss gave a presentation about the Countywide Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan and the Alachua County Safe Streets and Roads for All Action Plan. 

Moss said she spoke with FDOT employee David Tyler before the meeting; the intersection of U.S. 41 and Poe Springs Road has been under FDOT study, and they believe a roundabout would be preferable to a traffic signal, although they are amenable to input from the public. 

  • “She mentioned people not drinking in churches on Sundays, and Cornell interjected, “That’s where the opposition is coming from.” Prizzia said, “Jesus turned water into wine… It doesn’t make any sense to me.” ”

    They are blasting Christians and blaspheming Jesus because they want more alcohol tax revenue. Regardless of your position on this issue we all gotta admit the county commissioners did nothing but poison the well. They have zero jurisdiction on this item. Stay classy, commissioners!

    • Have you ever known or seen an alcoholic?

      Alcoholism is a disease….it ruins so many people’s lives.

      A day of rest from boozing is good.

  • Well I for one celebrate shabbos and I want the commission to prohibit alcohol sales from sundown on Friday to sundown Saturday. It’s offensive to see people inbibe and carrying on during my holy day. See how silly alcohol blue laws get. Why is one religion favored in limiting time and place of their perception of vice and not others.

    • Put it to a city-wide vote. Don’t get personal like the county commissioners did. I’m not for or against their current law…but the county commissioners who brought up Christians and Jesus should be ashamed. Did they just now realize that most of the people they represent are in fact Christians?!

        • See…we do have something in common. It’s hard to make friends when you despise the two party political system! Take care.

      • Not all Christians would be against Sunday alcohol sales nor are all “Christians” active church goers.

        As to county commissioners interference and letting voters decide, you don’t object to the state taking over City of Gainesville property and don’t want it’s citizens to vote on how their property is run.

        Why the sudden conversion to democracy?

        • And not all non-Christians are in the pro-stinking-drunk category, either. The fact is younger people barely drink, so this will become more and more of a non-issue as time passes. There’s a reason The Top doesn’t even bother to open on Sunday mornings anymore.

        • Jazzman, the difference between the two is obvious. The GRU-City vote directly impacts county residents/ratepayers. Additionally, Gville is attempting to override state legislation. Thirdly, the city is corrupt and has a documented history of squandering GRU profits for pet projects.

          The High Springs vote does not directly impact everyone else in the county. It’s strictly a local decision.

          • Slice, county residents are customers, not owners of GRU, and they have no more recourse for complaints now than they did previously, nor would they if they changed their service to FPL or Duke. Any customers can negotiate with suppliers, but they can’t hi-jack ownership.

            The state legislation which the city is trying override is the equivalent of the county commissioners sitting in on the High Springs meeting if they tried to take it over. Further more – and this is important – the state GOP has neutered Gainesville and Alachua County voters by gerrymandering and we have only 1 state legislator who wins in either the city or county. All the rest of “our” supposed representatives and senators get their majorities from outside the county. WE HAVE NO REPRESENTATION IN THE STATE LEGISLATURE. And that is not an accident.

  • No Repeal.

    How about the lushes STOP DRINKING ?

    Drinking does nothing Good for Anyone !

    No Liquor, Beer or Wine at all especially on Sunday.

    Have a Shirley Temple or a Kombucha !

  • Lily-white Prizzia, this is for you as well as the other commissioners who weren’t around when Petteway’s or Rimes & Cain were in High Springs or bought vegetables from Langford’s produce stand. You’re like locusts, just around to devour things.

    Matthew 23 Then Jesus said to the crowds and to his disciples: 2 “The teachers of the law and the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat. 3 So you must be careful to do everything they tell you. But do not do what they do, for they do not practice what they preach. 4 They tie up heavy, cumbersome loads and put them on other people’s shoulders, but they themselves are not willing to lift a finger to move them.

    5 “Everything they do is done for people to see: They make their phylacteries[a] wide and the tassels on their garments long; 6 they love the place of honor at banquets and the most important seats in the synagogues; 7 they love to be greeted with respect in the marketplaces and to be called ‘Rabbi’ by others.

    For Cornell, have another drink at a Chamber of Commerce meeting and remember to thank the servers when they they bring you that drink, they’re not your personal servants.

        • Nothing is simpler than a round-about if you’re not senile.

          You can go from NW 6th St and University to either SW 13th ST and Depot or S. Main and S 16th Ave in a couple of minutes, no stopping. You can go from Waldo/Williston to SW 13th and Depot or Univ and NW 6th ST in a couple of minutes, no stopping.

          You can go from Parker Road and SW 8th to Tower and SW 24th or to Newberry Rd and 241 in a couple of minutes, no stopping.

          Maybe you guys like parking at a red light or 2 or 3 instead, but that’s idiotic.

          • Simple when traffic permits.

            Maybe that’s why they’ve turned Archer Rd and 34th into a (im)practical 4 way stop. The idiots in Gainesville aren’t capable of making left turns when opposing traffic is making a left turn.

            Now if they could synch the traffic signals so one doesn’t turn out of a green turn signal into a red that’d really be something. Better yet, the so-called traffic engineers should stop the lights at NW 6th & NW 23rd and NW 6th & NW 16th from changing in 1 second when no traffic is sitting or approaching. Doesn’t happen all the time, but it happens more than it should early in the morning. The City has been notified and they’ve ignored it. Someone will be in an accident and they can blame the City. The M & Ms are going to win the lottery for someone.

          • PS You voted. 34th and Archer is a 4 way stop? Say what!!!???

            City and County lights are synched. Go visit their headquarters on NW 39th east of 6th and see for yourself.

          • PS to the PS – Our area was one of the 1st to introduce flashing yellow left turn arrows, an innovation visiting relatives have told me they wished they’d get back home. Maybe they’re too complicated for You voted and George to understand.

          • By the way, what appears to be complicated is opposing traffic making left turns at the same time. See Archer Rd & 34th, NW 53rd & 34th, NW 39th & NW 6th, NW 13th & 39th, 441 & 34th, NW 43rd & NW 8th,…as I stated, there’s many idiot drivers who don’t know how to make a left turn.
            Let me know when you catch up.

          • They’re not synched and if you think they are, it’s no wonder you miss the trash and other filth along NE 1st.

            Archer and 34th is obvious. If you’ve been here as long as you claim, you can remember when east and west, and north and southbound turn lanes could make those turns simultaneously, (the opposing lanes). Now the turn lanes progress around the intersection. Take a look.

            Lights on major arteries should not turn red if there’s no intersecting/perpendicular traffic at 4 in morning. That’s not efficient, but that pretty much sums up Gainesville.

          • Getting stopped at a red light OCCASIONALLY, for usually less than a minute, is no big deal.

            Round-abouts suck all of the time. They impede thru-traffic flow ALL of the time.

          • When there’s no traffic traveling East to West and the North to South traffic, (the primary corridor), has to brake for no reason other than traffic engineers’ incompetence, it does make a difference. Especially when the N to S traffic only has time for 1 vehicle to go through. Maybe they’re the ones who decided it would be best to make 6th to Main a bike path.

          • You voted, I travel those circles along Depot, SW 6th ST, and S main all the time and traffic is never jammed, so yes, it’s simple to drive and helps keep jams down. Your 2nd post is not specific enough to know WTF you are saying. Besides being always free moving, Depot has become an exercise corridor, and even the regular sight of pretty coeds jogging it doesn’t slow or stop traffic.

            George you’re drunk or insane. Maybe you’d like to park at SW 91st and 24th, 6th and 2nd, 6th and 4th, 6th and Depot, Depot and Main but that’s nuts.

          • I’m not going to apologize for your lack of understanding. Travel NW 6th south to north or vice versa before 7 a.m. and you will.

  • Mayor Grunder stated that a very large majority of the High Springs community is in favor of repealing this ordinance. Although he is the Mayor, Mr. Grunder has no standing to speak for the community, when community voices have repeatedly negated his claim that the majority is in favor.

    Through a procedure known as “passing the gavel” it seems our appointed Mayor Grunder clearly orchestrated a vote to repeal this ordinance. These types of surreptitious actions erode trust in our officials.

    Mayor Grunder interfered in due process and openly claimed that others had a vendetta against the brewery. Just because residents embrace peaceful enjoyment of their community does not mean they are against the Brewery itself. It just means that – reasonably enough – not everyone subscribes to the same lifestyle. Posturing this as a ‘them v. us’ contest is immature. Mayor Grunder was out of line and went as far as to call a fellow commissioner a LIAR! This challenge to the ordinance did not have to become contentious and I contend that Mayor Grunder has played a role in this. Discussing, much less voting on this issue at the joint commission meeting should never have been allowed to occur.

    I assert that Mayor Grunder should have let the process unfold in the proper procedural manner. If there is a challenge to a rule/law/ordinance, then there is a way to lawfully and ethically address it, rather than to ‘sneak’ it into an inappropriate forum. The Brewery is currently following the appropriate process by circulating an active petition to bring this issue to the ballot. I absolutely support this effort and feel that it is a constructive and constitutionally supported approach. The voters will ultimately make this decision, as it should be. Let’s have a secure voting process, like the one recently done in Newberry, and let the residents decide.

    • Janet was 100% on target. This was only put on the agenda because Mr. Grunder did not attend the agenda discussion meeting and we had no one at the table for High Springs to object to someone putting it on for this meeting. It blatantly violated the “Home Rule” Doctrine. When asked to be taken off the agenda, the County refused! By all reasonable appearances, this was a backdoor procedure to sneak it upon the citizens of High Springs that evening. Our City Commission has voted NO five straight times on this motion! The Brewery moved here knowing it was a quiet, mostly religious community, and they agreed to honor that understanding. Many Citizens enjoy family activities in our parks or river properties. The Brewery is not the defacto City Park of High Springs, and contrary to their belief, life will go on just fine if folks cannot sit at their picnic tables and drink even nicely crafted beer. We don’t dislike the brewery, but we don’t like your constant attempt to force your will on this community.

      • I appreciate your passion for our community, and I think it’s clear that we all care deeply about the future of High Springs. That said, I’d like to respectfully offer a different view and clear up a few points.

        First, it’s important to understand that no laws were violated, and nothing was “snuck in.” The item was discussed publicly at a joint meeting between the City and County Commissions — a forum that was properly noticed and open to everyone. Citizens spoke, commissioners voted, and no decisions were made in secret. That’s not a backdoor move — that’s public process.

        Regarding the “Home Rule” Doctrine, this was not a county forcing something onto a city — it was a joint meeting, agreed upon and attended by both sides, with the goal of working together. Collaboration between local governments is a strength, not a violation.

        As for the brewery, no one is trying to turn it into a park or force beer on families. In fact, it has become a gathering space for residents of all backgrounds — hosting fundraisers, family events, music, food trucks, and yes, craft beer. It’s one of several small businesses helping to drive local tourism and keep our downtown alive.

        Repealing the Sunday ordinance isn’t about pushing an agenda — it’s about allowing our town to support small, locally owned businesses on equal footing with surrounding communities. It’s about economic stability and giving residents and visitors more reasons to spend time (and dollars) in High Springs — without compromising the peaceful character we all value.

        Disagreeing is part of democracy. But dismissing a group of hardworking neighbors as trying to “force their will” does a disservice to the respectful debate this community deserves. Let’s keep talking — and listening — in a way that reflects the best of who we are.

    • Thank you for sharing your thoughts. I truly believe that we all want what’s best for High Springs — a strong, respectful, and transparent local government, and a community that feels heard.

      That said, I want to offer another perspective.

      Mayor Grunder, like any elected official, has both the right and responsibility to represent what he hears from his constituents. He’s spent years in service to this town and, like the rest of the Commission, is doing his best to navigate a deeply divided issue with fairness and transparency. While emotions are running high, I think it’s important to remember that passionate debate does not equal improper conduct.

      The “passing the gavel” procedure — where the mayor hands off facilitation to participate in discussion or make a motion — is a long-standing and legitimate process used in countless municipal settings. It’s not a trick; it’s a tool that allows elected officials to engage in the debate like anyone else at the dais.

      As for the discussion itself, it didn’t happen in secret. It happened at a public meeting, open to all, with both city and county commissioners present. Citizens had a chance to speak. That is the process — not a breakdown of it.

      I agree with you that the petition effort is a great way forward. If a vote brings clarity and closure, then let’s welcome it. But let’s not paint leaders as dishonest or divisive for doing their jobs — especially when they’re advocating for the economic survival of local businesses and a path toward responsible growth.

      We all care about this community. Disagreement is part of democracy — but trust, respect, and facts should be part of it too.

  • Anyone living in High Springs wanting a busier High Springs will one day regret it. Once it grows it will never go back to being a small, quaint town, and you’ll miss it. Be careful what you wish for.
    Remember….growth threatens the beautiful springs and farmland, I don’t care what anyone says, it’s common sense.

  • >