Bielarski: No longer can we dream

Letter to the editor

Despite all the gnashing of teeth, handwringing, and pontificating from the dais this past Thursday night, not one elected official – not a single one – was able to put the blame where it truly belongs – at City Hall’s doorstep. Instead, Mayor Ward, Commissioner Eastman, and others deflected from the real reasons for the 29% property tax increase, comfortable in simply blaming the State and the loss of a sizeable portion of GRU’s transfer for the City’s ills. Like Letterman, here are my top five reasons why the City is in a pickle:

  • 5. GRU subsidization of the City through support services – For decades, General Government has been unwilling to pay GRU for its actual cost of Information Technology (IT) services. Regularly underpaid by $2 to $4 million a year, GRU has funded approximately $20 to $40 million of IT services over the past decade.  
  • 4. Solar Feed-in-Tariff – The little-understood program where approximately 400 GRU customers installed rooftop solar panels in exchange for being paid on the order of 10 times the cost of wholesale electricity GRU could otherwise purchase. The reverse Robin Hood program has forced the remainder of GRU customers to subsidize those 400 GRU customers by upwards of $50 million since the program started.  
  • 3. The race to become a New American City – Apparently it takes a lot of employees to become the next great New American City. As the chart below shows, General Government (all City services outside of GRU) grew by 244 employees over the past 7 years, in such areas as the Department of Mobility, Sustainability, and that fan favorite – the Department of Doing.   

At the same time, during my tenure as GRU’s General Manager, we reduced GRU’s workforce by 50 positions. If General Government (GG) had held a similar line on hiring, it would have had 1,265 employees on its payroll in FY 2022, not 1,580 – 315 fewer people!

Assuming the additional positions cost the city $50,000 (with all the benefits), the total impact of this bloated City payroll budget has grown to almost $16 million a year or somewhere around $50 million over the past seven years. The incremental buildup of those 315 additional employees is the main reason GG’s budget has grown from approximately $100 million to over $150 million a year.

  • 2. Excessive transfers from GRU to the City – While GRU’s cash reserves were being depleted by the fiscal impacts of the Biomass PPA and plant, the commission kept pulling money out of the utility. From 2018 through 2021, the commission demanded GRU hand over $68 million more than what they earned! This fact may have been the single biggest reason for Clemons’ bill passing through the Florida legislature.  

Even worse, for decades GRU has paid the commission all that it earns. Whereas a business typically retains profits for investment, GRU has not been allowed to re-invest in internal IT or make plans to replace its 5 power plants that are over 40 years old under the governance of the city commission. If GRU had retained 30% of its profit like Tallahassee, JEA, Orlando, and Lakeland, GRU’s reserves would be well over $200 million higher today.

Advertisement
  • 1. Biomass PPA – The one-sided, onerous, Biomass Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) approved by the commission in 2009 was a $2.5 billion poison pill for the community. The annual cost of the Biomass PPA was $75 million whether the plant ran or not. Even with the historic buyout of the contract that saved $1 billion of that obligation, $660 million in debt was left on GRU’s books. Today, the cost of the Biomass debt is around $40 million a year. Over the 30-year life of the biomass plant, the PPA will cost the city $1.5 billion!

Bottom line:  Without 5) GRU’s IT subsidization of General Government, 4) the Solar Feed-in-Tariff, 3) overstaffing as a result of racing to be a New American City, 2) the excess transfers to the City, and 1) the ill-advised Biomass PPA, the City of Gainesville and GRU would be in a much different place. In fact, we’d conceivably be looking at a debt-free utility ready to face the environmental challenges with strong funding and a powerful credit rating. Instead, the once-prominent utility is weakened, and the Governor has been forced to step in. That’s right, it’s not Clemons’ fault. Nor is it Keith Perry’s or the Governor’s. It is the fault of GRU’s governing bodies over the past two decades, which have used GRU as a piggybank for all that they could dream of.  

Commissioner Casey Willits inadvertently said it best: “We have pivoted from thinking about our biggest, greatest, grandest dreams in Gainesville to what we have to do to survive.” Welcome to the real world, commissioner, albeit two decades too late.

For those that want to read more, my book, “The City that lost control,” is available on Amazon in paperback and Kindle editions.    

Ed Bielarski, Gainesville

Ed Bielarski is a former General Manager of GRU.

The opinions expressed by letter or opinion writers are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of AlachuaChronicle.com. Letters may be submitted to info@alachuachronicle.com and are published at the discretion of the editor.

27 Comments