Bielarski: Fact or Fiction, Part 8

Letter to the editor

Are GRU customers better off now than when the City Commission governed GRU?

In 1980, Ronald Reagan asked the nation, “Are you better off than you were four years ago?” The same question can be applied today to GRU customers. But unlike Reagan, I am confident you are better off today, under GRU Authority governance. Following are a few of the reasons why. 

Savings from natural gas prepayment arrangements

Under the leadership of the GRU Authority, GRU has entered into a series of natural gas prepayment arrangements guaranteeing discounts totaling more than $5 million a year over a minimum of 5 years on future purchases of natural gas. These purchases supply our power plants and customers. 

When presented with the same opportunity in 2019, the City Commission refused to enter into these arrangements, giving away millions of dollars that could have reduced customer bills.

Reductions in residential customers’ 1,000 kWh bills

The GRU Authority has reduced customer bills. As of August 2025, the average monthly 1,000 kWh residential electric bill has fallen from $152.35 to $136.60, or 11%, during a period of high inflation.

No increases in electric base rates over past two years

The Authority’s decisions to forgo electric base rate increases has brought GRU’s average residential bills closer to the middle of the pack among Florida utilities. Whereas the average municipal electric bill fell from $124.57 to $123.79, a drop of less than 1%, GRU customer bills have fallen 11%.

Additional Debt Reduction

The City Commission oversaw a $12 million accelerated reduction in debt over the four-year period between fiscal years 2020 through 2023; conversely, the GRU Authority has overseen a $66 million reduction over a two-year period between fiscal years 2024 and 2025.

Reduced the general fund transfer burdening GRU

The GRU Authority voted to reduce the annual transfer of GRU profits to the City from $15 million to $8 million (a reduction of $6.8 million a year for 10 years) to recoup $68 million the City had taken from GRU in excess of profits between fiscal years 2018 through 2021.

Extended a lower-priced rate tier

The GRU Authority extended the prior 850 kWh-per-month rate to 1,000 kWh-per-month, providing 60% of our customers with relief on their electric bills. 

Summary

These are a few examples of how the City Commission could have saved customers money but lacked the vision, desire, or business sense. Instead, under City Commission governance, GRU customers were subjected to:  

  • One of the state’s largest-ever above-market power contracts in the $2.5 billion biomass deal;
  • One of the largest debt buildups among public utilities, including JEA, which has four times the revenue;
  • The highest electric rates in the state. 

Conversely, the GRU Authority is:  

  • Extending the life of GRU’s power generating assets, not unlike how our customers might extend the life of their cars or home appliances; 
  • Aggressively paying down debt, like our customers paying down credit cards;
  • Reducing payments it can’t afford to pay the City as we achieve middle-of-the-pack status on our electric bills.

GRU CEO Ed Bielarski, Gainesville

Click here to read Part 1 in the series.

Click here to read Part 2 in the series.

Click here to read Part 3 in the series.

Click here to read Part 4 in the series.

Click here to read Part 5 in the series.

Click here to read Part 6 in the series.

Click here to read Part 7 in the series.

The opinions expressed by letter or opinion writers are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of AlachuaChronicle.com. Assertions of facts in letters are similarly the responsibility of the author. Letters may be submitted to info@alachuachronicle.com and are published at the discretion of the editor.

  • We are WAY BETTER OFF, with the City Commission’s hands out of the GRU Cookie Jar!😎👍
    Keep up the Good Work Bielarski!👍👍

    • Absolutely, we are better off with the GRU authority! No way in heck should the city ever get the utility back when they cannot even tell the truth to JLAC! And still cannot tell the truth to the constituents.

      • The city and it’s voters built and own GRU. If the state GOP or the county want it, they should make an offer.

  • Thanks Ed.

    For those short of attention span and the idiots who keep electing those idiots on the Commission…

    1.The GRU Authority has reduced customer bills. – My bill

    2. No increases in electric base rates over past two years. – My bill

    3. Additional Debt Reduction. $66 million > $12 million. – Debt carries costs, costs passed on to customers – me.

    4. The GRU Authority voted to reduce the annual transfer of GRU profits to the City from $15 million to $8 million (a reduction of $6.8 million a year for 10 years). – A direct impact on GRU technologies, modernization, and employee pay and compensation. Commissioner Saco gave employees 🖕🏻.

    To think people have a difficult time understanding why the GRU Authority was created is disturbing. It’s easy to understand why those in favor of giving control of GRU profits back to the same group who has increased the rates, utilized those profits for their personal agendas, increased questionable departments’ budgets, voted themselves raises, turned 8th Ave into a rarely used bike lane, spent millions on trash cans, increased rates and limited downtown parking to the detriment of local businesses…

    Yeah, only idiots would vote for those types and letting them regain control of funds.

    • Yes, if only we had a democracy where citizens voted for their leaders.

      Idiot!

      • You meant to say, “If we didn’t live in a county of ill-informed voting idiots who elected other idiots as their rulers.”

        You’re welcome. Now go get your breakfast.

  • It would be great if we could put Bielarski in place of Mayor Ward to fix the City’s problems.

    • Getting rid of the mayor would be but one step of getting rid of some of the city’s problems.
      There’s several more but the voters seem to like the problems.

    • Yes Beatnik, if only we had a democracy where citizens voted for their leaders.

  • We would be even better off if Ed dealt with massive SLA Losses which he continues to obscure. Our BILLS ARE NOT in the middle of any “pack”.

  • As a longtime GRU customer I can say without a doubt that we are much, much better off under the state-created GRU Authority.

    The only reason the GRU Authority even exists is because the thieves in the Gainesville City Commission were bleeding our utility dry. Year after year, they stole the profits and unfairly “taxed” ratepayers who don’t even live in Gainesville via fees and rate increases to pay for their unpopular woke pet projects.

  • Again, Bielarski has shown he can’t tell fact from fiction, or if he does has no problem selling fiction.

    The much larger issue is the theft of the utility from the City and it’s voters which built and has owned it for over 100 years. That includes owning it’s profits and IT’S DEBTS. GRU had the same credit rating as FPL when the state GOP took it over, with one of the main movers of that partisan and hostile takeover a traitor to his town and recipient of illegal campaign money of $100,000 from (wait for it) ………… FPL.

    https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/state-politics/article264196761.html

    • Municipal utilities have higher debt ratings than investor owned utilities because they have the faith and credit of the municipal behind them as well as the state in most cases. Apples to oranges. Try again.

      Also your endless diatribe about citizens owning the utility in every circumstance is devoid of any understanding of legal consequence to the city’s action which allow for such stage action.

      No matter how often you say something it wont make it true.

  • >